At 10:12 PM + 7/10/02, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
>Chip Salzenberg wrote in perl.perl6.language :
>> In (re?)examining the Apocalypses, I've found something that confuses me a
>> bit. A2 refers to C as a "pseudopackage" and says:
>>
>> __LINE__ becomes MY.line
>> __FILE__
At 4:24 PM +0100 7/10/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> At 9:50 PM -0400 7/9/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
>> >3. Is C<%MY> intended to reflect the PAD?
>>
>> Yes.
>
>Hey! How's this for a scary thought:
>
>$continuation.the_pad
What's that suppos
Chip Salzenberg wrote in perl.perl6.language :
> In (re?)examining the Apocalypses, I've found something that confuses me a
> bit. A2 refers to C as a "pseudopackage" and says:
>
> __LINE__ becomes MY.line
> __FILE__ " MY.file
>
[...]
>
> With regard to C:
>
>2. What
At 04:24 PM 7/10/2002 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > At 9:50 PM -0400 7/9/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > >3. Is C<%MY> intended to reflect the PAD?
> >
> > Yes.
>
>Hey! How's this for a scary thought:
>
>$continuation.the_pad
>
>I'll get my
At 9:50 PM -0400 7/9/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
>3. Is C<%MY> intended to reflect the PAD?
Yes.
> 3a. If so, how can one distinguish among the e.g. many C
> variables declared within the current function?
One pad per block, rather than per sub.
--
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:50:26PM -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Based on what I rememeber from the long threads about this,
>3. Is C<%MY> intended to reflect the PAD?
loosely speaking yes.
>
> 3a. If so, how can one distinguish among the e.g. many C
> variables declared within
