> > > Dave Storrs wrote:
> > > Can we please have a 'reverse x' modifier that means "treat whitespace as
> > > literals"? Yes, we are living in a Unicode world now and your data could
> > >
> > > /FATAL ERROR\:Process (\d+) received signal\: (\d+)/
> >
> > I don't see how this example is near
A5 says this:
> I'm accepting the basic premise of this RFC that the ?...? construct is
> going away, one way or another.
and perlop (from 5.6.1) says this:
> ?PATTERN?
> ...
> This usage is vaguely deprecated, which means it just might possibly
> be removed in some distant future v
Andy Wardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 06:51:19AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
>> I have no doubt that, once Perl 6 is available, we'll see a rash of
>> modules released in the Grammar:: namespace. Including
>> Grammar::HTML and Grammar::XML.
>
> I have no doubt that, o
