Dan Sugalski writes:
: At 3:11 PM -0800 4/3/02, Larry Wall wrote:
: >Piers Cawley writes:
: >: Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: >:
: >: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:27:10AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: >: >> They are assumed to be declared in alphabetical order. Whoa! you say,
: >:
At 07:12 AM 4/5/2002 +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
>Melvin Smith wrote:
>
> > 1) In Perl6 we can tag metadata properties to an object using the 'is'
> keyword.
>
>Err, no. We can add properties to a *class* using C.
>To tag objects (which are run-time phenomena) we'd use C.
Oops, ok this was my mi
Melvin Smith wrote:
> 1) In Perl6 we can tag metadata properties to an object using the 'is' keyword.
Err, no. We can add properties to a *class* using C.
To tag objects (which are run-time phenomena) we'd use C.
> 2) Also, in Perl6 we can derive a new class from an ancestor using 'is'.
Corre
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 11:09, Luke Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, James Ryley wrote:
> How 'bout:
>
> $foo = 'def';
> $bar = 'ghi';
> $y = 'abc$foo$bar';
> $z = eval qq{"$y"};
>
> Of course, for security and correctness reasons, you'd probably want to:
>
> $y =~ s/\\//g;
> $y =~ s/"!/\
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 20:49, Larry Wall wrote:
> : Additionally, can you chain statement modifiers?
> :
> : do_this() if $a unless $b;
[...]
> No, still can't chain them.
That's a darned shame. In p5, I keep going back to code and finding
something like:
print foreach @x;
and wanting
At 3:11 PM -0800 4/3/02, Larry Wall wrote:
>Piers Cawley writes:
>: Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>:
>: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:27:10AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
>: >> They are assumed to be declared in alphabetical order. Whoa! you say,
>: >> that could get confusing. It s
Reading Apoc and Exeg 4 I liked most everything. It has already
been said many times how Perl6 is finally getting features
the OO guys have been wanting forever, so I won't state the
obvious again, but I would like to propose an alternate keyword...
1) In Perl6 we can tag metadata properties to a
Piers Cawley writes:
: Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: > Larry explained:
: >
: >> : Umm. didn't you say bare blocks were going away?
: >>
: >> Rule #2 was invoked.
: >>
: >> The current thinking is that any bare block will never be interpreted
: >> as returning a closure. Yo
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, James Ryley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anything ever became of the comments at
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00318.html?
>
> I have an application that would benefit from double interpolation. Of
> course I can work around it, but double interpolation would be so muc
Hi everyone! My name is Miko O'Sullivan, and I've been a devoted Perl
Hacker for several years now. I'm looking forward to participating in the
discussion of Perl 6. To give a little perspective on my comments, I got my
degree in Marketing about a decade ago, and I've never quite decided if I'm
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 Apr 2002 00:34]:
> hi,
> I thought it will be good if on dev.perl6.org we have an arhive with
> all Apo's and Ex's, so anyone can get them in pack... (prefebaly
> printed version) Throught the links I got all except Apo1. Anyone to
> have the link nearb
Hi,
I was wondering if anything ever became of the comments at
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00318.html?
I have an application that would benefit from double interpolation. Of
course I can work around it, but double interpolation would be so much
cleaner. Was it ever implemented, or will it be?
S
hi,
I thought it will be good if on dev.perl6.org we have an arhive with all Apo's and
Ex's, so anyone can get them in pack... (prefebaly printed version)
Throught the links I got all except Apo1. Anyone to have the link nearby
iVAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Danke very much :")
13 matches
Mail list logo
