On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 08:36:31PM -0500, John Siracusa wrote:
> On 10/28/01 7:57 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
> > method foo is lvalue {
> > return $foo;
>
> Any word on automagical creation of these suckers? No, not as a module, but
> built-in.
They're called "
On 10/28/01 7:57 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
> method foo is lvalue {
> return $foo;
Any word on automagical creation of these suckers? No, not as a module, but
built-in. I don't think it's too crazy to build *some* sort of sensible
attribute accessor auto-creat
On 10/28/01 7:03 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
> Brent asked:
>> I assume we're going to recycle 'my' and 'our' to be 'instance' and
>> 'class'--is that correct?
>
> That's what I'm proposing.
So should I start practicing my typos for "instance" now? Insatance
instancae instance. Mmmm... ;P
> I fa
Aaron wrote:
> Several questions come up.
>
>* If $.foo is "like" the Perl5 $self->{foo},
Except (as I'm sure you know) that Perl 6 class instantiations aren't
hashes, and their attributes aren't hash entries.
> how do I do the Perl5 $self->foo?
.foo()
>* Is "fo
Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brent told us:
>> All these Star Trek references are threatening to make my warp core
>> breach... :^)
>
> Too much information.
Look, I'm sorry, okay? I only finished up the article with a Trek
reference because, whilst I could see Larry as G
Brent asked:
> # Well, I'm not a Damian, but I play one on perl6-language. ;-)
>
> Well, then, where's a *real* Damian? :^)
The Real Damian is the Damian inside each of us.
You need to get in touch with your *own* inner Damian.
;-)
> I assume we're going to recycle 'my' and '
