>Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
>assembley language. I've got:
> ...
>Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since I've
>done numeric work.
HP calculators sometimes define
lnp1(x) = ln(1 + x)
expm1(x) = exp(x) - 1
to deal accu
At 05:42 PM 9/12/2001 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
>Uri Guttman can see a day where:
> > python and ruby, etc. are
> > defaulting to using the parrot back end as it will be faster, and
> > compatible with perl etc. imagine the work reduction if all/most of the
> > interpreted languages can share o
Uri Guttman can see a day where:
> python and ruby, etc. are
> defaulting to using the parrot back end as it will be faster, and
> compatible with perl etc. imagine the work reduction if all/most of the
> interpreted languages can share one common back end.
What about the compiled ones? Did we c
