At 02:12 PM 9/10/2001 -0700, Hong Zhang wrote:
> > Uri Guttman
> > > we are planning automatic over/underflow to bigfloat. so there is no
> > > need for traps. they could be provided at the time of the
> > > conversion to big*.
> >
> > OK. But will Perl support signaling and non-signaling NANs?
>
> Uri Guttman
> > we are planning automatic over/underflow to bigfloat. so there is no
> > need for traps. they could be provided at the time of the
> > conversion to big*.
>
> OK. But will Perl support signaling and non-signaling NANs?
I don't think we should go for automatic overflow/underf
Uri Guttman
> we are planning automatic over/underflow to bigfloat. so there is no
> need for traps. they could be provided at the time of the
> conversion to big*.
OK. But will Perl support signaling and non-signaling NANs?
Dan Sugalski wrote:
>Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
>assembly language. I've got:
[...]
>
>Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since I've
>done numeric work.
I'm not a math weenie, but I would thing gamma(x) would be of use.
Also
At 10:58 AM 9/10/2001 -0700, David Whipp wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the
> > interpreter assembly language. I've got:
>[...]
> > Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while
> > since I've done numeric work.
>
>I'm not sur
> "DW" == David Whipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DW> Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the
>> interpreter assembly language. I've got:
DW> [...]
>> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while
>> since I've done numer
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the
> interpreter assembly language. I've got:
[...]
> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while
> since I've done numeric work.
I'm not sure where this belongs, but I'd really like to have
a usage
