On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:37:41PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
> Uri Guttman wrote:
>
> > one related point is that this symbol table will be accessible via
> > caller() so you could access/install lexical symbols in a parent block
> > on the call stack. scary!
> >
> > uri
>
> We must demand t
At 03:37 PM 7/16/2001 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
>Uri Guttman wrote:
>
> > one related point is that this symbol table will be accessible via
> > caller() so you could access/install lexical symbols in a parent block
> > on the call stack. scary!
>
>We must demand that the feature come with a wa
Uri Guttman wrote:
> one related point is that this symbol table will be accessible via
> caller() so you could access/install lexical symbols in a parent block
> on the call stack. scary!
Quite. Does anyone have a pointer to tchrist's rant on Tcl's upvar?
--
John Porter
