Re: dLoo releases peer-to-peer programming language

2001-07-11 Thread stéphane Payrard
- Original Message - From: "Cameron Laird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:43 PM Subject: Re: dLoo releases peer-to-peer programming language > > From [EM

Re: dLoo releases peer-to-peer programming language

2001-07-11 Thread Cameron Laird
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 11 >13:35:23 2001 > . > . > . > The lesson to be drawn is consistent with Dan sayings: it is an excellent way to >spread a product as a browser or better as a > plug-in but the security model must be thought ab initio.

Re: dLoo releases peer-to-peer programming language

2001-07-11 Thread stéphane Payrard
- Original Message - From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 6:59 PM Subject: Re: dLoo releases peer-to-peer programming language > At 10:16 AM 7/11/2001 -0600, Natha

Re: reparsing the ambiguous

2001-07-11 Thread Ilmari Karonen
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, David L. Nicol wrote: > > Statistics break at the edges. I meant something that > will expand > > $$$name[5]{cheese} > > into [snip] > my $RVAL; > eval { >$RVAL = ${${${name}[5]}{cheese}} > }; # normal p

Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring?

2001-07-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:24 AM 7/11/2001 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote: >Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > > At 11:01 AM 7/10/2001 -0400, Adam Turoff wrote: > > >And where's the guarantee that vtbls are per-object and not per-class? > > > > VTABLES ARE PER OBJECT. > > > > So mote it be. :) > > > >

Re: dLoo releases peer-to-peer programming language

2001-07-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:16 AM 7/11/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: >nile writes, "Today, dLoo released the complete architecture of an >extensible peer-to-peer programming language." And I thought NFS was the security hole from hell... Unless there's a lot of very clever (research-level, "Hi we're from IBM's

Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring?

2001-07-11 Thread David L. Nicol
Dan Sugalski wrote: > > At 11:01 AM 7/10/2001 -0400, Adam Turoff wrote: > >And where's the guarantee that vtbls are per-object and not per-class? > > VTABLES ARE PER OBJECT. > > So mote it be. :) > > Dan What? Up until now it's been vtable-pointers are

dLoo releases peer-to-peer programming language

2001-07-11 Thread Nathan Torkington
>From newsforge: nile writes, "Today, dLoo released the complete architecture of an extensible peer-to-peer programming language. Unlike traditional languages, this language is defined on the Internet. Its syntax and semantics can be extended by posting additional pieces of the language. As de