On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:14:52AM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> > Yes. And the modules on CPAN that already do this are interesting too.
>
> Oh, bother. Oh well, I've got builtinify (which was actually the point of the
> exercise) and they haven't, so I'm happy. :)
Something like Function::Over
At 07:20 PM 2/19/2001 -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
>RFC 362
>---
>
>=head1 TITLE
>
>The RFC project should be ongoing and more adaptive.
It's my understanding that this is, in fact, the plan. The only reason
things have paused (and it is a pause, not a stop) is that we're waiting
for Larry
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:58:35PM -0700, Tony Olekshy wrote:
> Hi, it's me again, the guy who won't shut up about exception handling.
> I'm trying,
I'm catching.
--
"Dogs believe they are human. Cats believe they are God."
As much as I'd like to respond to some of these points, I'll refrain from it
now, I'll let my RFCs speak for themselves.
Speaking of which... apologies in advance for cross-posting this, but I wanted
to get the largest audience possible... I won't do it again. At least not in the
forseeable fut
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:00:11PM -0500, John Porter wrote:
> Simon Cozens wrote:
> > Incidentally, I just implemented pre- and post- handlers on subroutines
> > in pure Perl 5, without any changes to the language. Interesting, huh?
>
> Yes. And the modules on CPAN that already do this are inte
Simon Cozens wrote:
> Incidentally, I just implemented pre- and post- handlers on subroutines
> in pure Perl 5, without any changes to the language. Interesting, huh?
Yes. And the modules on CPAN that already do this are interesting too.
--
John Porter
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 06:46:11PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> This actually came as a side-track to something else I was doing which was to
> make some subroutines appear like builtins; (available from all packages)
> I'll put Sub::Versive on CPAN when I've done *that*.
It's up. Enjoy.
--
Use
[ Cc: perl6-language, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Yaphet,
As you may be aware, I've been a bit absent from p6-language lately, as
I've been moving to Canada and rather busy. So I apologise for not
having brought this up earlier, which I really should have done as
Perl 6 Language working group chair and
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 01:17:56PM -0600, David L. Nicol wrote:
> "currying" used in a fascinating context: an experimental
> language in which
>
> http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/madore/programs/unlambda/#tut
Oh, nooooOOO!! Those with small children, heart conditions or a
weak stomach,
"currying" used in a fascinating context: an experimental
language in which
http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/madore/programs/unlambda/#tut
everything is a unary function.
Multiple-argument functions are defined in such a way that
the function takes the first argument and returns a functio
Incidentally, I just implemented pre- and post- handlers on subroutines
in pure Perl 5, without any changes to the language. Interesting, huh?
sub foo { print "Bar\n"; }
append_to_sub {print "After!\n"} &foo; # Perl 5.6.x (&\&) syntax
append_to_sub {print "After!\n"}, \&foo; # Perl <5.6 syntax
f
Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 09:01 PM 2/15/01 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:08:47AM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
> > > However, that still doesn't get rid of the gotchas - personally I think that:
>
> > >
> > > my $a, $b, $c;
> > >
> > > should be
12 matches
Mail list logo
