I've got one ready to go on the topic of "Perl 6: the story so far".
I'm presenting it next week at linux.conf.au and would be happy to
submit it for YAPC and/or TPC.
K.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:11:56PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Barring anyone else doing it, I should go to YAPC and talk about perl 6's
> guts, at least the bits available at that point. TPC too. ('Course, there's
> the question of getting there, but that's a separate issue)
Well, if you can'
Giving talks at YAPC is a no brainer, and I see the criteria of creating public
documents and the existance of a deadline being exceeding good
things.
Documenting the knowlege and preventing the authors from obfuscating the documents (by
accident, of course) will generate far to much noise f
At 02:39 PM 1/12/01 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>John van V writes:
> > If perl.org is unacceptable for some reason I can easily create a
> > mailing list on puny.vm.org
>
>Thanks for the offer, but I don't think we'll need it. I think we're
>hampered right now by the fact that we don't know
John van V writes:
> If perl.org is unacceptable for some reason I can easily create a
> mailing list on puny.vm.org
Thanks for the offer, but I don't think we'll need it. I think we're
hampered right now by the fact that we don't know much about what
perl6 is going to look like. Until we get m
