Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from core

2000-08-24 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and "Michael Maraist" whispered: | >From this, socket, and virtually all IPC methods should go the wayside. | This includes pipes, shell environment ops ( the get and set functions ), | and even the file-io (open, close, and possibly even printf, sprintf). At |

Re: RFC 155 (v1) Remove geometric functions from core

2000-08-25 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> whispered : | Is there are a problem with Math::Trig I've not been told about? | Well, sqrt() is not strictly speaking just for trigonometry. | But I wonder what log() is doing in the proposed list. I wanted to write th

Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from core

2000-08-25 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Tom Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] m> whispered: | Unless that's done completely transparently, you'll pretty much screw the | pooch as far as "Perl is the Cliff Notes of Unix" notion. Not to | mention running a very strong risk of butchering the performan

Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core

2000-08-25 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wh ispered: | However, since those funtions take up about 200 lines in the core, are | very stable and relatively easy to document, what do we win by | removing them? | | PS The idea of adding acos, asin and tan is good

Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core

2000-08-25 Thread Stephen P. Potter
$!, | or $?, or anything that might call anything from the C library. Ok, here's my new RFC. This should handle all of Tom's objections: =head1 TITLE Perl is Tom's private domain. =head1 VERSION Maintainer: Stephen P. Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 8/25/2000 Versio

Re: We're all grown-ups on this bus...

2000-08-27 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> whispered: | or we can all darned well fake it at the very least. Dan, Larry, and the rest of the members of perl6-internals: I apologize for my behaviour the other evening. It was childish and served no purpose on this lis

Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core

2000-08-27 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> whispered: | Depends on your definition of "module". Many people seem to be assuming | "module" eq "shared library". Yes, exactly. I use module as a generic term for something other than the main perl binary itself, a black b

Re: RFC 155 (v2) Remove mathematic and trigonomic functions from core binary

2000-08-28 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> whispered: | I think this is inappropriate for sin/cos/tan et. al. and possibly even | sockets (although Win32 sockets are weird enough that it would be worthwhile) | | But for getpw* or shm/queue/msg or other may-not-b

Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core

2000-08-29 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Tom Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] m> whispered: | Very well, then: I'll save it for an after-the-fact I-TOLD-YOU-SO, | which, believe it or not, is truly *not* a pleasant thing to be | able to say. Tom, we appreciate your constructive comments and your hel

Re: Thought for the day

2001-02-01 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and "raptor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> whispered: | ok, | | "I've done it in one row, why you want it to fit in 80 columns ?!" (or | something like that can't remember well) "You want it in one line? Does it have to fit in 80 columns? :-)" -lwall -spp

GC sublist?

2001-02-16 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Is this (these) thread(s) to the point where it is worth spinning off a new sublist? If a couple of the main contributors (Dan, Simon, Branden, etc) say yes, can we get perl6-internals-gc created? -spp

Re: require < 6.x

2001-02-21 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and "NeonEdge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> whisper ed: | This is probably way too late, but does this make any sense: could p6 allow | (for the first few versions anyway) a "require <6;" directive? Do you understand how the current "require #;" works? It already pretty

Re: PDD X: Perl API conventions

2001-03-05 Thread Stephen P. Potter
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Damien Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> whispered : | ISO/ANSI C reserves identifiers beginning with a _. I recommend using | "perl_" and "perl__" if you want to distinguish internal-only functions | from public ones. I'd be worried that "_" and "__" are too hard t