RE: [PATCHES] Exception idea

2001-10-26 Thread Stephen Howard
If I might make a very small suggestion, for clarity's sake you might want to consider renaming your opcodes push_e and pop_e, or push_x and pop_x. I don't know if this violates any naming conventions you already have in place, however. -Stephen -Original Message- From: Jeff [mailto:[

RE: String rationale

2001-10-29 Thread Stephen Howard
You might consider requiring all character sets be able to convert to Unicode, and otherwise only have to know how to convert other character sets to it's own set. -Original Message- From: Tom Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 02:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: String rationale

2001-10-29 Thread Stephen Howard
it that Unicode module could be responsible for all the transcodings to and from it's own character set, which seemed backwards to me. -Stephen -Original Message- From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 02:43 PM To: Stephen Howard; Tom Hughes; [EMAI

RE: on parrot strings

2002-01-21 Thread Stephen Howard
Not to get modifier-happy, but it seems like a user-oriented solution would be to let the user specify a modifier: "caseinsensitive" =~ m/CaseInsensitive/i "resume" =~ m/re`sume`/d (diacritic modifier?) -Stephen -Original Message- From: Hong Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mo