RFC: Perl should support non-linear text

2000-11-03 Thread Roland Giersig
Maintainer: Roland Giersig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 19 Oct 2000 Version: 1 Mailing List: perl6-internals ? Number: ? =head1 ABSTRACT Right now, Perl performs its magic only upon linear strings of ASCII and Unicode text. As Ilya Zakharevich has stated in his recent interview (http://

Re: SvPV*

2000-11-22 Thread Roland Giersig
es perl6 worthwile. I've attached the RFC again and would hope to at least get some "Nah..." or "Yeah!" as feedback. Cheers! Roland -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] =head1 TITLE Perl should support non-linear text. =head1 VERSION Maintainer: Roland Giersig <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: SvPV*

2000-11-23 Thread Roland Giersig
Nicholas Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 01:24:50PM -0500, Chaim Frenkel wrote: > > I'd offer the possiblity that there are two (or perhaps more) > > different problems here. One is the current bunch of bytes (string, > > executable to be twiddled) Another which the attribute on strings

Re: SvPV*

2000-11-24 Thread Roland Giersig
Bart Lateur wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 08:54:43 +0100, Roland Giersig wrote: > > >Maybe the title should be : > > > >"Perl should use XML as its basic data type instead of linear strings" > > Horrible. > > I kinda liked your original

Re: SvPV*

2000-11-24 Thread Roland Giersig
David Mitchell wrote: > > Roland Giersig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Maybe: > > > > "Perl6 should excell at manipulating *formatted* text." > > Quite possibly, although as a previous poster has pointed out, > formatted text != XML. Yes

Re: Meta-design

2000-12-07 Thread Roland Giersig
Dan Sugalski wrote: > I object to targetting GCC specifically for two reasons, > though, neither of them VMS related: > > 1) Targeting a single compiler, no matter whose it is, is a bad idea. We're > writing in a *language*, not for a compiler. Targeting a specific compiler > restricts us even m