This is a comparison of mops running on Parrot (-O6 on an Athlon 700)
versus Java JDK 1.4.0 beta 2 jitted and interpreted. You can see that
Parrot performance is very comparable to Java in interpreted mode.
I've attached mops.class and mops.ksm, some disassembly output from
Kopi. mops.class was
> I have an Athlon 700 too. With these compiler flags:
>
> PERL-CFLAGS = -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -s -march=pentium -ffast-math \
> -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-strict-aliasing \
> -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
>
> I'm seeing 24 mops which puts Parrot even cl
Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
> I have tested times using computed goto in the interpreter and here are
> the results:
>
> # ./test_prog mops.pbc
> Iterations:1
> Estimated ops: 3
> Elapsed time: 8.604721
> M op/s:34.864582
Yes, I wrote a poor-man's computed goto versio
