I'll try this out on Darwin and (Debian) Linux this weekend and see what
happens. Thanks.
additional light on this in the last six
>weeks?
>
No. So it's still on my TODO list. Thanks for looking into it.
Jim Keenan
>From: Will Coleda via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 2007/07/02 Mon AM 08:28:11 CDT
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [perl #43463] [BUG] Parrot Bug Summary "Requestors with most open
>tickets" doesn't DWIM
>Need to strip out the HTML comment on the link; the url for
>you is actually:
>
>http://r
One of the test files I wrote for configuration step class auto::alignptrs,
t/configure/124-auto_alignptrs-05.t, has been getting failure reports on one
particular test -- but not on all platforms, and not on a platform I have
access to.
I would like to follow up with the folks running these sm
A wiki has been created for the Perl Hackathon in Chicago coming up Fri-Sun
Dec 14-16 -- just a little over two weeks away.
http://perlcast.com/hackchicago2007/index.cgi
Are any Parrot developers besides my planning to attend? If so, please
register and sign up on the wiki.
Thank you very mu
Todd Olson via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2007/11/28 Wed AM 08:39:24 CST wrote:
>
>One feature I have been exploiting extensively in my Perl 5 installs
>is cpan.pm's MyConfig.pm which permits me to overlay Perl's %Config
>and to swap sets of config changes in and out with out messing with
>the ba
>From: Andy Dougherty via RT
>Date: 2007/12/11 Tue AM 08:38:17 CST
>Subject: Re: [perl #48459] [PATCH]: Refactor config/inter/progs.pm into 2
>config steps
>
>I don't think this will work. Specifically, to conduct a "basic test of
>that compiler's functioning" you need to compile *and link*
>From: Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I am confused why this wasn't failing for allison & chromatic. I added
>in the missing headers in r26227.
>
I'll try to update and give it another spin later today.
>From: Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>I am confused why this wasn't failing for allison & chromatic. I added
>in the missing headers in r26227.
>
Note that I was reporting on an earlier revision. In
"20080304.26216.pdd17pmc.txt", the second bunch of digits is the revision
number at which
>From: Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I am confused why this wasn't failing for allison & chromatic. I added
>in the missing headers in r26227.
>
All tests passed at r26228 (except the macro.t test that's been failing in
trunk).
kid51
>From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 2008/03/26 Wed PM 05:13:17 CDT
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [perl #52130] [BUG] postconfigure tests hanging on feather.
>> > I'll try to look into this. What's puzzling is that we get tested on
>>> *many* Linux boxes but the o
11 matches
Mail list logo
