J. David Blackstone wrote:
> I always treat the return value of time() as a black-box value. I
>can perform specific actions on it, such as feeding it to localtime()
>or adding relative time intervals to it, such as a year of seconds.
>But I do not allow myself to look at that value. I was ki
Jonathan wrote:
>
>On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 09:45:55AM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
>> I don't know about this. Sounds cool, but I think we should stick to
>> something that somebody somewhere uses already. Of course, something
>> standard like 0 AD isn't bad.
>
>Standard for whom? I bet there are
Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
=
=At 11:26 AM 8/23/00 -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
=
=>I expect that we'll get more compile-time benefit from
=>
=> my HASH sub foo {
=> ...
=> }
=>
=> %bar = foo();
=
=So how would you fill in the type in:
=
=my TYPE sub foo {
= ...
=
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm picturing a WAP-enabled cellular furbie with
> an R2D2-style projector thingie for the video.
> It's not a pretty sight...
"Help us Lawrence Wall, you're our only hope..." bzzp!
"Help us Lawrence Wall, you're our only hope..." bzzp!
"Help us Lawr
Dan wrote:
>At 09:12 AM 8/25/00 -0400, Stephen P. Potter wrote:
>> As you say, 200 lines isn't much. But combine that with the IPC, the
>>environment, the system, etc it all adds up.
>
>Not to much, though. We've been down this road for perl 5. You'd be
>surprised at how little code gets remove
(voice over)
When we last left our heroes,
Dan Sugalski-Walker , Master Larry Wall
Damian-3P0, and FurB-D2
were on their way to find a fast ship.
With the plans for perl 6 in the memory banks of FurB-D2,
they were going to the Monterey System to announce the
start of Perl 6 and to marshal togethe
