the
current RFC topics are dependant on this issue. (I'll do the RFC if
this is ok)
Grant M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
() (arrays start at 0 or 1) (language)
Backward compatibility in general (who knows)
If someone could just tell me where these discussions go
(as many aren't really defined yet) I would be grateful. Also,
If I have missed anything let me know,
Grant M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cop' (Just a thought).
Grant M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RANDOM THOUGHT (please don't hurt me):
What about allow a 'daemon-mode'? This might be really not an option, but it
could be beneficial in a sense that there would be one core, and any other
instances would be spawned child processes?
Does that make any sense? Mind you, it's still early.
Grant M.
at this probably isn't where Perl 6 is going, most embedded
systems these days have I/O that can exist in three states (1, 0, or Hi-z).
Grant M.
27; way,
then who are we to tell them that they are wrong. I started as an embedded
systems developer for the 8051, and I know full well what sorts of
limitations a system like that has. And don't kid yourselves, there are
still alot of those systems still chugging away.
Grant M.
being discussed.
Grant M.
ting code often would turn out to be
reasonably more complex. However, just because the code is more
complex, doesn't necessarily mean it's bigger.
Grant M.
