I
> prefer the latter, now that nested namespaces work. The test modules and all
> code which uses them needs to change to follow this example.
>
> This should take about 20 minutes for a motivated CAGE cleaner. If no one
> gets to it on the bug day, I'll do it.
>
> -- c
>
--
Thanks,
Badai Aqrandista (cheepy)
now. I'll work on it tonight.
--
Thanks,
Badai Aqrandista (cheepy)
Changed [ 'Test::More' ] to [ 'Test'; 'More' ]
Patch level 1
Source: 4c149bba-1ebb-4b29-940e-6c2cefc7587e:/parrot/local:599
Target: d31e2699-5ff4-0310-a27c-f18f2fbe73fe:/trunk:20643
(https://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk)
Log:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: cheepy | 2007-07-14 05:14:58 -0400
Cre
Hi,
Sorry I just read the docs/submissions.pod and realized I shouldn't
have submit the patch here. I'll resubmit it in proper way to
parrotbug.
--
Thanks,
Badai Aqrandista (cheepy)
n' ]
unless valid_tp goto CHECK_TESTNUM
And apparently 'does' doesn't accept keys as $3.
Can anyone suggest what I should do?
--
Thanks,
Badai Aqrandista (cheepy)
object_base {
$1 = $3 ? $2->vtable->does(interp, $2, $3) : 0;
goto NEXT();
}
Note the lack of '=cut' before the code. Is that intentional?
2. Can I add another 'does' implementation which accept PMC as $3 like
'isa'? This means adding 'Parrot_object_does' to src/object.c as well.
--
Thanks,
Badai Aqrandista (cheepy)
Hmm... chromatic answered question 2 when I was writing this question.
Let me add new opcode for 'does' tonight or tomorrow night. I want to learn.
On 8/20/07, Badai Aqrandista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two questions. These questions arise because
