On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 06:18:55AM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote:
> As a matter of fact GB18030 is ALREADY supported via Encode::HanExtra by
> Autrijus Tang. The only reason GB18030 was not included in Encode main
> is sheer size of the map.
Yes, partly because it was not implemented algori
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 02:20:15AM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote:
> >2) If not, would a Encode::ICU be wise?
> I'm not so sure. But if I were the one to implement Encode::ICU, it
> will not be just a compiled collection of UCM files but a wrapper to all
> library functions that ICU has to offer. I, f
(Sorry for the cross-posting; announcement of future releases will
appear only on the perl6-compiler list.)
Quite appropriately, on Day 6 of Pugs, I have released Pugs 6.0.0.
It should be on a CPAN near you in a few hours, under the Perl6::Pugs
namespace. You may install it from the CPAN shell j
(Cc'ing this post to p6i and p6l, as this is likely to concern folks
from all three mailing lists.)
As of Pugs revision 1024, this works:
% pugscc --runparrot -e "'Hello, Parrot'.say"
And yes, it does what you think it does. Pugs takes that Perl 6 source
code, produce an AST, triggers the Co
(Cc'ing this post to p6i and p6l, as this is likely to concern folks
from all three mailing lists.)
As of Pugs revision 1024, this works:
% pugscc --runparrot -e "'Hello, Parrot'.say"
And yes, it does what you think it does. Pugs takes that Perl 6 source
code, produce an AST, triggers the Co
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 04:44:52PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I had a look at the generated mandel.imc. Remarkable, how compact
> Parrot.hs is and what it already does.
Thanks. One of my remaining large TODOs before Pugs 6.2.0 is to
recode the evaluators in Template Haskell as Compile/Haskel
After a IRC meeting with Leo, I've outlined my roadmap of how to make the three
compiler backends in Pugs to work in concert to provide a much faster evaluator:
http://use.perl.org/~autrijus/journal/23890
Note that existing code in the Eval monad need not be rewritten; also
Pugs will still ru
I am delighted to report that the first major milestone of Pugs, version
6.2.0, has been released to CPAN:
http://wagner.elixus.org/~autrijus/dist/Perl6-Pugs-6.2.0.tar.gz
SIZE (Perl6-Pugs-6.2.0.tar.gz) = 642482
MD5 (Perl6-Pugs-6.2.0.tar.gz) = 8d5438d49db872ffe2394fd4995d335b
It repres
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:41:52AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Anyway Parrots MMD system depends on types. *If* the Perl6 compiler defines
> above array as
>
> cl = subclass "FixedFloatArray", "num_Array_shape_3_3_3"
Yes, that is what I am planning to emit for hierarchical and other
subtype
Because I want to embed PGE in Pugs, I end up embedding the
entire libparrot. :-)
As of two hours ago, if you set the PUGS_EMBED environment
variable to "parrot" and run perl Makefile.PL, Pugs will
build and link against Parrot, and provide a require_parrot()
primitive for you. JIT works as one o
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:22:11PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Whilst I confess that it's unlikely to be me here, if anyone has the time
> to contribute some help, do you have a list of useful self-contained tasks
> that people might be able to take on?
Following some discussion on #perl6, it s
Hey. Leo suggested to me on #parrot to drop a note on p6i,
asking about obtaining the committer to the Parrot tree.
As some of you know, Pugs can now evaluate PIR via an embedded
Parrot interpreter:
$ ./pugs -e 'eval_parrot'
42!
as well as compiling Perl 6 to PIR, evaluating it in memor
I'm glad to report that Pugs is now a registered Parrot compiler:
$ cat roundtrip.p6
eval_parrot '
compreg $P0, "Pugs"
$S0 = "say qq[There... and back again!]"
$P0 = compile $P0, $S0
invoke $P0
';
$ ./pugs roundtrip.p6
There... and back again!
Greetings. Attached is a patch that I'm currently using in Pugs's
bundled PGE.pbc, in order to make PGE output properly escaped strings,
in a format ready to be used form Haskell FFI.
I'd appreciate comments, and if it's okay to commit it back to the
PGE directory.
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
Patch
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:25:43PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:24:49AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> > Greetings. Attached is a patch that I'm currently using in Pugs's
> > bundled PGE.pbc, in order to make PGE output properly escaped
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:11:12AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please excuse the possible 'out of left field' (as we say) aspect of this
> question but I recently heard about Omniscient Debugging (ODB):
> http://www.lambdacs.com/debugger/debugger.html
This seems to require almost the same j
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:19:50AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> 2) named access
>
> x = getattribute o, "Point\0x"
>
> This needs a full qualified attribute name "Class" ~ NUL ~ "Attribute".
> That's unusable for at least Python and probably more HLLs as the
> compiler has to know in which c
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:09:00PM -0400, Dino Morelli wrote:
> >Feel free to correct 'no_plan'. I'll happily apply any and all
> >patches to the tests, and those with commit privs are welcome
> >to directly modify the t/p6rules/*.t files at any time.
> >
>
> Speak of the devil -- I started worki
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:55:12PM +0200, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> As fas as I see, the only place where .cvsignore files are still used, is
> tools/dev/manicheck.pl.
> If we require 'svn', than we can replace the reading on .cvsignore with
>
> svn propget svn:ignore
>
> Is that the right w
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:00:14PM +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> But when I look at http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/embed.html, I can
> see no way of getting information back from the script - not even an
> exit code. Is there anyway of doing this that I have missed?
You may wish to use Parrot_c
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:31:32PM +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> I take it SS stands for String-to-String?
Yes. "PPC" would stand for PMC -> PMC -> String, i.e. take two PMCs
and returns a String.
> Which section within http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/ covers this sort
> of thing?
`perldoc ex
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:34:39AM +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> I have a problem with this - namely that the function is variadic, and
> the interface generator can't cope with this.
Hmm, in Haskell FFI, we hard-coded two cases of invocation, treating
the function as two distinct, non-variadic
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 05:42:48PM +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> The problem I'm finding with this, is getting back the returned string
> characters.
> I assume the void * returned is pointing to a Parrot String.
> Certainly it's not a const char *.
Yes.
> There is a function declaration
> Par
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:53:15AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 05:42:48PM +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> > There is a function declaration
> > Parrot_string_cstring
> >
> > in string_funcs.h, but it appears to have no definitoon anywhere, so
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:53:15AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Yeah, I bumped against that too. You need to look at the "strstart"
> field in the ParrotString struct.
>
> In Haskell I use:
>
> peekCString =<< #{peek STRING, strstart} s5
Actually, never
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:30:51PM +0530, Dheeraj Kumar Arora wrote:
>I m interseted in one of LLVM project
> "Implement well-known optimizations in PIR compiler (SSA ->
> register allocation)"
> Can Any send me the details?
I'm not an expert with with PIR or SSA,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:21:00AM -0700, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
> On 6/13/05, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh no ... it's even worse than you think. Almost *any* opcode that
> > operates on a PMC can trigger a continuation. And I only need two
> > words to prove it:
>
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 06:52:35PM +0200, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > > Isn't this *exactly* why Perl 6 is requiring you to mark tied
> > > variables when they're declared?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Um:
>
>my $x is tied;
>tied $x, SomePackage;
>unsuspecting_victim(\$x); # ???
Hmm, you can't
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 01:39:08PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I can see two ways to go:
>
> a) e = interpinfo .INTERPINFO_EXCEPTION
>
> b) via the get_params opcode
>
> The latter would reflect the exception call being an internal
> continuation invocation:
>
>push_eh handler
>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:35:11PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> I'd like to add Punie to the Parrot repository. It's a first step
> toward a compiler for Perl 1 running on Parrot. Currently it's *very*
> simple: it only parses and compiles a single statement printing a
> single digit -- but it
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:41:00PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Is it Punie's goal to support all of those semantic constructs? If not,
> maybe call it something else than Perl 1, to avoid confusion? :)
(more bikesheding)
If the goal is to demonstrate the capability of the upcoming
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:43:55PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> >As Schwern will attest, Perl 1 is a quite complicated language, with
> >nullary, unary, binary and ternary functions, arrays, hashes, pattern
> >matches, transliteration, format, loop control and labels.
>
> As a test case for the
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:17:48PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2005, at 0:37, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> >That's cool. In that case I'll commit the test suite from perl-1.0_16
> >as TODO tests to the Punie tree, if that's okay with you. :)
>
>
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:03:25AM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> So, I re-wrote it. It now talks about PIR, and has examples in PIR. It
> mentions how PIR differs from PASM. Subroutines now get a look in to the
> introduction, and it mentions in passing that Parrot is capable of doing O
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:07:22PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> Anyone given any thought to Parrot <-> Java integration?
I have been looking at IKVM:
http://www.ikvm.net/
It's basically a full Java environment but using CLR instead of
JVM as the underlying runtime. The JIT conversion from Java
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 04:51:58PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> There was some recent discussion [1] [2] on p6l about BEGIN blocks and
> constant, which is executed at compile time too.
>
> Parrot has since quite a time the @IMMEDIATE subroutine pragma, which
> causes execution of subs during
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 06:00:43PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> This shouldn't be a problem (at least when the last few globals from
> imcc are gone), i.e. compilation / running code should be fully re-rentrant.
Oooh, that will be much better.
> BTW can you explain why the above example print
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:37:41PM +0200, Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
> I released a few days ago the Neko intermediate language at
> http://nekovm.org . In the FAQ I'm comparing Neko to LLVM / C-- and Parrot.
> According to a mail sent to me by Leopold Toetsch I got some points wrong
> when trying to
On 11/4/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a quick example, one can now use the subrule
> to parse a perl 6 rule expression, and the Match object
> that is returned contains the parse tree. Other examples
> and demonstrations or parsing are in the examples/pge/
> directory.
p
On 11/6/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, for null input, PGE (and p6rules) will likely parse this
> by returning a Match object indicating "false", and attempting
> to compile that object will probably return a null subroutine.
Yes, that sounds sane.
> The other case is
40 matches
Mail list logo
