Will Coleda via RT wrote:
On Tue Jul 22 23:34:13 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
This version of the patch should dtrt with all versions of
strerror_r. It
works on my Debian/x86 box and I'll be testing it on any *nix I can
get my
hands on Tuesday. If it works f
Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> I tried to build parrot with the clang, an llvm frontend. It provides a
>> script called 'ccc', which accepts the same options as gcc.
>
> Works for me with "perl Configure.pl --cc=llvm-gcc --link=llvm-gcc".
That works for me too, but it's a complet
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:14 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Apr 07 21:31:15 2008, coke wrote:
>> This has been removed in the type_ids branch.
>
> Coke,
>
> Can you provide any update on this deprecation and/or the type_ids branch?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> kid51
>
Moritz,
I applied parallel-r.patch to trunk at r30978 on Darwin (10.4 PPC),
successfully built and tested Parrot, built Perl 6, then got the results
below out of 'make test'.
Since I build and test Perl 6 infrequently, I'm not sure whether these
results are different from what I would have gotten
No problems have surfaced since last post: closing ticket.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:11 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it just me ...?
Yup.
> When I went to rt.perl.org just now to reply to a ticket, I could not find
> the toggle for automatically CC-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know it was
> there just last night. I am clearly logged i
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:51 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coke, particle: Where do we stand on this ticket?
>
> thank you very much.
>
> kid51
>
I haven't touched a win32 build of parrot in some months now, msvc or
otherwise. Smolder is probably a better place to look for
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:56 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coke, particle: Can we get an update on the issues raised in this RT?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> kid51
>
I haven't touched a win32 build of parrot in some months now, msvc or
otherwise. Smolder is probably a bett
2008/9/11 James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Moritz,
>
> I applied parallel-r.patch to trunk at r30978 on Darwin (10.4 PPC),
> successfully built and tested Parrot, built Perl 6, then got the results
> below out of 'make test'.
>
> Since I build and test Perl 6 infrequently, I'm not sure wh
Will Coleda wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:11 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it just me ...?
Yup.
When I went to rt.perl.org just now to reply to a ticket, I could not find
the toggle for automatically CC-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know it was
there just last night. I am
Will Coleda wrote:
Now that we can subclass PMCs with Objects, we need to go through all
the code in src/pmc/*.pmc that directly fiddles with PMC guts (e.g.
PMC_int_val(...) and PMC_num_val(...) and replace them with VTABLE
accessor methods, or constructs like SELF.get_integer().
Just for clar
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Vasily Chekalkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:11 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it just me ...?
>>
>> Yup.
>>
>>> When I went to rt.perl.org just now to reply to a ticket, I could not
>>>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 08:11:50AM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> Is it just me ...?
>
> When I went to rt.perl.org just now to reply to a ticket, I could not
> find the toggle for automatically CC-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] I
> know it was there just last night. I am clearly logged in to RT. Wh
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 07:53:13PM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Patrick:
>
> Where do we stand in the deprecation cycle re these three methods?
I probably just need to remove the methods from the code,
see what breaks, and fix what breaks. I'll try to do that this
weekend before the relea
2008/9/11 Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:56 PM, James Keenan via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Coke, particle: Can we get an update on the issues raised in this RT?
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>> kid51
>
> I haven't touched a win32 build of parrot in some months
On Thursday 11 September 2008 04:03:27 Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
> > Now that we can subclass PMCs with Objects, we need to go through all
> > the code in src/pmc/*.pmc that directly fiddles with PMC guts (e.g.
> > PMC_int_val(...) and PMC_num_val(...) and replace them with VTA
Will Coleda wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:51 PM, James Keenan via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Coke, particle: Where do we stand on this ticket?
>>
>> thank you very much.
>>
>> kid51
>>
>
> I haven't touched a win32 build of parrot in some months now, msvc or
> otherwise. Smolder is
NotFound wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:12 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The line numbers reported by clang seem sensible enough, but do they match
>> values in src/pmc/default.str? Mine contains:
>>
>> #define _CONST_STRING_45 80
>> #define _CONST_STRING_103 534
>> #define _C
I just downloaded and built parrot-0.7.0. The PIR program from the original
bug report no longer SEGFAULTS.
However:
1) make test had this result:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
---
t/perl/Parr
Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
Will Coleda wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:11 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is it just me ...?
Yup.
I've got same problems... This link not always appears on reply page.
(In my case it's appears very rare...)
Ah, so it's not just me!
I had t
On Thu Sep 11 14:28:08 2008, rblasch wrote:
>
> I haven't seen this using Visual C++ 9.0. I'll also run a test with
> 6.0, 7.1 and 8.0. Is it okay if I close this ticket if nothing special
> shows up?
Absolutely!
The patch was indeed applied in r30640 (with touch-ups in r30645) on
2008-08-29. There have been no complaints, so I am resolving the ticket.
Thank you very much.
kid51
I'm trying to see if we can move this ticket toward resolution. I think
that it has remained unresolved for so long because the original post
originally called for two steps: (a) removal from Configure.pl of
configuration steps which probed for features only used in specific
language implementati
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:47 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to see if we can move this ticket toward resolution. I think
> that it has remained unresolved for so long because the original post
> originally called for two steps: (a) removal from Configure.pl of
> c
On Thu Sep 11 08:30:49 2008, moritz wrote:
> Since the feedback so far was mostly positive (and none defeating) I now
> applied the patch. Thanks go to all contributers and testers.
>
> If there are some problems with the test harness, please open a new
ticket.
>
FWIW: Here are the results I got
James E Keenan wrote:
1. I will encourage all of you who wrote me to get Bitcard accounts
(http://tinyurl.com/5eqcw8) so that you're eligible to post patches
through our RT interface (http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public). One of the 6
already has an RT account; the others of you should get one.
On Thursday 11 September 2008 14:04:20 Clark Cooper wrote:
> However:
>
> 1) make test had this result:
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
> ---
> t/perl/Parrot_Test.t 666 55 57
27 matches
Mail list logo
