Allison Randal wrote:
Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
We could always do the 12th AND the 16th, just for fun and bonus
productivity (if everyone isn't exhausted from a day of hacking and
three days of conference)? ;-)
I'm also flexible. 12th and 16th sounds good to me.
I've booked to arrive in
2008/7/28 jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:08:06AM -0700, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
>>> In the source repository, the 'parrot' in runtime/parrot/foo is
>>> pointless. It's a singleton direc
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Jul 28 13:00:02 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with m
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> In the course of working on unit tests in the 'parallel' branch, I came
> across this inline comment in config/gen/makefiles.pm:
>
> # Why is this here? I'd think this information belongs
> # in the CFLAGS.in file. -- A.D. March 12, 2004
# New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
# Please include the string: [perl #57358]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57358 >
Hi,
The attached patch allows testing of parrot to be parallelized via
setting an envi
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:43 AM, via RT Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
> # Please include the string: [perl #57358]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57358 >
>
>
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # from James Keenan via RT
> # on Sunday 27 July 2008 18:45:
>
>>> It appears that this test assumes (multiple times perhaps?) that it
>>> may make named files in /tmp/.
>>
>>Are you saying that making named files in /tmp (
Eric Wilhelm (via RT) wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
> # Please include the string: [perl #57358]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57358 >
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch allows testing of
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Wilhelm (via RT) wrote:
>> # New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
>> # Please include the string: [perl #57358]
>> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
>> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/
Geoffrey Broadwell via RT schrieb:
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 13:13 +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
+stat $I0, conf_file, 0
+if $I0 goto conf
+
+# If installed into /usr/lib/parrot, not /usr/runtime/parrot
+# This logic has to be reversed when installed versions should
run faster
+
Will Coleda wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Moritz Lenz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Eric Wilhelm (via RT) wrote:
>>> # New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
>>> # Please include the string: [perl #57358]
>>> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
>>> # ht
On Monday 28 July 2008 09:52:36 Moritz Lenz wrote:
> >> t/steps/auto_attributes-01.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 9
> >> Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 255
> >> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 12 tests but ran 9.
> >> t/steps/auto_headers-03.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 8
>
# from Moritz Lenz
# on Monday 28 July 2008 09:52:
>> That's not -just- with the patch, though, is it? I presume you've
>> set TEST_JOBS to be something other than '1' ...
>
>I've set it to 2, and obeserve the errors below. With serial testing I
>get a PASS (r29828).
Yes. TEST_JOBS=1 doesn't cha
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # from Moritz Lenz
> # on Monday 28 July 2008 09:52:
>
>>> That's not -just- with the patch, though, is it? I presume you've
>>> set TEST_JOBS to be something other than '1' ...
>>
>>I've set it to 2, and obeserve the error
- Original Message -
From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To properly support $tcl_precision in tcl, I need to change how I'm
currently implementing {$tcl_precision == 0}. Right now, I just fake
it by setting the precision to 16, but that isn't right.
where something like
{expr
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from Moritz Lenz
> # on Monday 28 July 2008 09:52:
>
>>> That's not -just- with the patch, though, is it? I presume you've
>>> set TEST_JOBS to be something other than '1' ...
>>
>>I've set it to 2, and obeserve the errors below. With serial testing I
>>get a PASS (r29828).
# from Moritz Lenz
# on Monday 28 July 2008 13:02:
>With enough RAM everything is fair game ;-)
>I ran it with $n == 20, and identified this list of files:
Yes. My reading of Parrot::Configure suggests that there's no tempdir
involved, which would need to be done per-process.
The alternative i
On Mon Jul 28 10:48:21 2008, particle wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Eric Wilhelm
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Tests need to be written defensively for arbitrary parallelization to be
> > possible.
The configuration step tests have been evolving for 13 months now, but
until
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:13 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Jul 28 10:48:21 2008, particle wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Eric Wilhelm
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >
>> > Tests need to be written defensively for arbitrary parallelization to be
>> > po
19 matches
Mail list logo
