chromatic wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008 20:25:16 Allison Randal wrote:
It's true that the generalized solution for varying callback signatures
doesn't exist yet, but it's easy enough to create your own C callback
layer, with a separate C function for each callback you need. (Note, not
one-pe
chromatic wrote:
Here's my crazy idea.
When you register a callback into PIR from C, you need to pass a few
arguments: the interpreter into which to call, the PMC Sub to call, and the C
signature of the C function which gets called from C.
I presume that the PIR function will get called thro
binlnxnMwhV0P.bin
Description:
Author: simon
Date: Sat Jan 19 21:55:18 2008
New Revision: 25030
Added:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd28_character_sets.pod (contents, props changed)
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/MANIFEST
trunk/MANIFEST.SKIP
Log:
[docs] A start on the charsets PDD. Will wri
On Sat Jan 19 21:05:32 2008, petdance wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2008, at 10:59 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > Occurs on Darwin as well: r25026.
>
> This should be OK now. I fixed the prototype.
>
Yes, make is now passing on both Linux and Darwin. Thanks.
Thanks for the ticket.
Updated README (r25035) to point to a section in submissions.pod which serves a
similar
purpose to the missing documention.
On Tue Dec 04 20:12:24 2007, coke wrote:
> From PDD17:
>
> =item class_type
>
>INTVAL class_type(INTERP, PMC* self)
>
> Return the integer type of the PMC. [NOTE: will be deprecated when type
> IDs are deprecated.]
The attached patch removes this vtable entry. The only thing still
which s
On Sat Jan 12 04:42:26 2008, allison wrote:
> This opcode has been superseded by 'inspect'.
The pmcinfo opcode is removed by the attached patch. I would have
committed this directly however, I'm not 100% sure that removing the:
'Class PMCs also have the "I am a class" flag set on them.'
test was
Completed as per r25053.
The attached patch should quieten some of the grumbling. It's entirely
comments, so should not have any functional impact.
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.com
Alan,
> The attached patch should quieten some of the grumbling. It's entirely
> comments, so should not have any functional impact.
The patch wasn't attached. Could you try again?
Thanks,
Paul
Author: allison
Date: Sun Jan 20 12:43:51 2008
New Revision: 25067
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd09_gc.pod
Log:
[pdd] A full rehash of the GC PDD.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd09_gc.pod
==
--- trunk/docs/p
On Jan 19, 2008 10:27 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 January 2008 19:20:22 Will Coleda via RT wrote:
>
> > Original command line has a slight red herring: the duplicated file name is
> > irrelevant:
> >
> > ./tclsh t/cmd_after.t
> >
> > causes the same issue. (chromatic++
Author: allison
Date: Sun Jan 20 12:52:42 2008
New Revision: 25069
Added:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd09_gc.pod
- copied unchanged from r25067, /trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd09_gc.pod
Removed:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd09_gc.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/MANIF
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #50032]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50032 >
in languages/perl6/ the command "make spectest" complains about
util/fudgeall which can't
From my journal:
I'm pleased to announce that after 2 years of hiatus and 6 months of
coding, mod_parrot 0.4 has been released. It's been worth the wait, as we
now have working mod_perl6 and PHP proof-of-concepts, per-vhost
interpreter pools, the framework for a more comprehensive test suite,
Sorry, finger trouble with the mailer lost the attachment. I will try
again later.
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.com
I've launched the GC PDD out of draft. Comments and suggestions welcome.
Allison
On Jan 20, 2008 1:23 PM, via RT Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
> # Please include the string: [perl #50032]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50032 >
>
>
> in langu
Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
On Sat Jan 12 04:42:26 2008, allison wrote:
This opcode has been superseded by 'inspect'.
The pmcinfo opcode is removed by the attached patch. I would have
committed this directly however, I'm not 100% sure that removing the:
'Class PMCs also have the "I am a class
On Jan 20, 2008, at 5:48 AM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Sat Jan 19 21:05:32 2008, petdance wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 10:59 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
Occurs on Darwin as well: r25026.
This should be OK now. I fixed the prototype.
Yes, make is now passing on both Linux and Darwi
On Sunday 20 January 2008 19:04:12 James Keenan wrote:
> Failed at r25076. Here's the output of 'prove -v' on i386-inux. I
> got similar failures on ppc-darwin. AFAICT, these developed in last
> 24 hours.
It'll fail everywhere; the culprit is r25029.
These headers and declarations are messy.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 03:06:34PM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
>
> looks to me like the 'clean' target in the makefile should delete the
> t/spec directory (it doesn't currently.)
I don't think that 'make clean' should remove t/spec. Because we now
grab t/spec via 'svn co', someone might have local
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #50038]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50038 >
Failed at r25076. Here's the output of 'prove -v' on i386-inux. I
got similar failur
On Sun Jan 20 08:57:52 2008, ptc wrote:
> Completed as per r25053.
The ticket is for removing the ability to do this, not merely removing the
instances where it is
done.
Re-opening ticket; Thanks for all the cleanup work, however, that should make
it easier to rip
out the actual code.
On Sun Jan 20 19:15:49 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It'll fail everywhere; the culprit is r25029.
>
... and that revision was the fix proposed for RT 50010.
On Sun Jan 20 13:17:03 2008, coke wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 10:27 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 January 2008 19:20:22 Will Coleda via RT wrote:
> >
> > > Original command line has a slight red herring: the duplicated
> file name is
> > > irrelevant:
> > >
> > > ./tclsh
On Jan 20, 2008 10:33 AM, Paul Cochrane via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this patch is ok, please say so, otherwise I'll apply it in three days.
Mission Control: Buckaroo, The White House wants to know is everything
OK with the alien space craft from Planet 10 or should we just go
ahead and
On Fri Jan 11 13:25:21 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed Feb 21 05:47:29 2007, kjs wrote:
> > On Wed May 24 05:26:22 2006, coke wrote:
> > > New addmethod opcode needs tests.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Will "Coke" Coleda
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > Attached a patch that adds a test f
On Jan 19, 2008 10:28 PM, via RT chromatic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because this patch is large and in charge, I'd like to hear some success
> reports from a couple of non-x86 and non-Linux platforms before I commit it.
>
> -- c
osx/x86 has no new failures with this patch applied.
--
Will "C
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #50046]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50046 >
pir_source_files in Parrot::Distribution is only looking for *.pir
files: this skips all
Spent some more time trying to track this down. On OSX/86, I was able to
reproduce the
segfault with much less tcl code:
%cat foo.tcl
after 10
%./tclsh foo.tcl
if I ran:
%../../parrot -G tcl.pbc foo.tcl
The segfault goes away, which smells like a GC issue.
However, I can't duplicate it with
32 matches
Mail list logo
