On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:24:58PM -0700, Audrey Tang via RT wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > IIRC having ASCII as the default was a deliberate design choice to avoid
> > the confusion of "is it iso-8859-1 or is it utf-8" when encountering a
> > string literal with bytes outside the range 0-127.
Here's another potential NS issue. It looks like find_global is being
affected by the .namespace directive: it's my understanding it should
only be affected by the .HLL directive. If you comment out the
second .namespace in this code, it prints "ok".
.$ cat foo.pir
.HLL 'bork', ''
.namespac
Will Coleda wrote:
Here's another potential NS issue. It looks like find_global is being
affected by the .namespace directive:
Yes. It sets the current namespace below the HLL namespace.
I think, this is the specced and correct behavior.
leo
From the PDD:
-
=item $P0 = find_global $P1, $S0
=item $P0 = find_global $S0
Find $P0 as the variable $S0 in the current namespace. or in $P1,
relative
to the HLL root namespace.
-
I'm using the first version, but it's relative to the namespace set
in .namespace, not relative to t
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:14:30PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
> >Here's another potential NS issue. It looks like find_global is being
> >affected by the .namespace directive:
>
> Yes. It sets the current namespace below the HLL namespace.
> I think, this is the specced
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:34:49AM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
> From the PDD:
> =item $P0 = find_global $P1, $S0
> =item $P0 = find_global $S0
> Find $P0 as the variable $S0 in the current namespace. or in $P1, relative
> to the HLL root namespace.
Heh, I'm sleepy so I forgot that the C form propos
On Apr 18, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:34:49AM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
From the PDD:
=item $P0 = find_global $P1, $S0
=item $P0 = find_global $S0
Find $P0 as the variable $S0 in the current namespace. or in $P1,
relative
to the HLL root namespace.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:42:38PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:34:49AM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
> >>On a side note, is there a way to get at the parent namespace if you have
> >>a namespace? I don't see anything in
Author: allison
Date: Tue Apr 18 13:45:23 2006
New Revision: 12354
Added:
trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd22_io.pod
trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd23_exceptions.pod (contents, props changed)
trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd24_events.pod
trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd25_threads.pod
Removed:
trunk/docs/pdds/cli
On Apr 8, 2006, at 19:49, Bob Rogers wrote:
. . .
=item *
C creates an exception handler and pushes it onto the
control
stack. It takes a label (the location of the exception handler)
as its
only argument. [Is this right? Treating exception handlers as
label
jumps rathe
10 matches
Mail list logo
