On Thursday 06 April 2006 21:21, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Sean Sieger wrote:
> > Done. May I submit the duplications a dupe at a time?
> How many are there? I think I'd prefer to see a whole list.
Depending on the size of the list, I agree -- it might be easier to see
On 06/04/06, Sean Sieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is parrot broken? I am getting an error that reads,
> config.fpmc is truncated.
You'll probably find that runtime/parrot/include/config.fpmc is zero
bytes, in which case try removing it and rerunning make. If the
problem persists, there's a pro
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:17:21PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> On Thursday 06 April 2006 14:04, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
>
> > 'punie' seems to be the only maintained language implementation using
> > Perl* PMCs.
>
> What about Ponie?
Ponie isn't using them.
Nicholas Clark
Author: leo
Date: Fri Apr 7 09:59:18 2006
New Revision: 12135
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pddXX_exceptions.pod
Log:
fix exception example
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pddXX_exceptions.pod
==
--- trunk/docs/pdds/
On Apr 6, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Will Coleda wrote:
On Apr 6, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:04:06PM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via
RT wrote:
Hi,
as far as I see, the Perl* PMCs are no longer used in the Parrot
core.
Thanks, Bernhard.
There is s
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:23:32AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: bernhard
> Date: Thu Apr 6 11:23:31 2006
> New Revision: 12129
>
> Modified:
>trunk/src/spf_render.c
>
> Log:
> Make some string formating test failures go away under
> Linux on i686.
> However I have no what had ca
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> There is still some usage in unmaintained language implementations:
> >>
> >> BASIC/compiler unmaintained ?
> >> BASIC/interpreter unmaintained ?
> >> forth unmaintained ?
> >> miniperlunmaintained ?
> >> parakeet
