Hi Nick,
Nick Glencross via RT wrote:
Yes, there's a problem building dynclasses on cygwin. [I think that there
are a few related calls logged]
One quick hack to complete the build is to type 'echo all: >
src/dynclasses/Makefile' after running Configure.pl.
Many thanks. I shall do that in
Guys,
I'd like to revive this patch which I posted a while back, but has
needed bringing up to date due to subsequent changes.
It has a few key intentions:
* Makes libparrot.so a 'first class citizen'
* Allows the installed version of parrot and its utilities to be
either shared or static
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:51:39PM +, Nick Glencross wrote:
> I'd like to revive this patch which I posted a while back, but has
> needed bringing up to date due to subsequent changes.
Thanks for your great work, Nick!
> I'd initially appreciate some feedback, and particularly reports of
>
On 12/22/05, Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:51:39PM +, Nick Glencross wrote:
> > I'd like to revive this patch which I posted a while back, but has
> > needed bringing up to date due to subsequent changes.
>
> Thanks for your great work, Nick!
>
> > I'
Tuesday, December 20, 2005, 8:09:32 PM, François PERRAD wrote:
> At 11:53 16/12/2005 +0100, you wrote:
>>I can think of two ways to fix this:
>>
>>- Hide every env access behind the platform stuff. That is, add
>>something like Parrot_environ.
> For me, this way sounds better.
> The platform/env
jerry gay wrote:
> compiling either with msvc 6.0 or 7.1 on win32, parrot behaves
> differently wrt 0 vs -0 depending on whether optmizations are enabled.
> nmake realclean && svn up && configure.pl && nmake smoke
> ## passes tests, which expect 0 and not -0
> nmake realclean && svn up && config
Short version: uncomment lines 86-87, patch follows. I was hoping I
wouldn't need them, but I was wrong. This has been tested, and should
produce the correct output now.
--- mandelbrot.pir 2005-12-22 11:51:15.0 -0500
+++ mandelbrot-new.pir 2005-12-22 11:51:07.0 -0500
@@ -83,8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 22, 2005, at 3:17 PM, peter baylies wrote:
Short version: uncomment lines 86-87, patch follows. I was hoping I
wouldn't need them, but I was wrong. This has been tested, and should
produce the correct output now.
--- mandelbrot.pir 200