Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yesterday on IRC chip and I went a bit through the following problem:
> --- integer.pmc 27 Mar 2005 13:14:18 - 1.25
> +++ integer.pmc 5 Apr 2005 16:02:26 - 1.26
> @@ -420,8 +420,23 @@
>
>void add (PMC* value, PMC*
François PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I rename too the new script to mk_inno.pl
Sorry for bothering you again. But with the recent ICU changes,
installing any ICU stuff is obsolete. ICU will be removed from the
source tree soon (when we switch to SVN).
> Francois
Thanks,
leo
Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>PMC constants
> Leo added support for .const things to imc. Unfortunately, the GC eats
> them so you can't use it.
I forgot to mention that PMC constants are properly marked now. So they
are usuable for all PMC types that provide an appropriate
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
3) we could probably lift the restriction that we link with c++
I replaced LINK = c++ with LINK = cc in the Makefile and it works.
Maybe I'm missing some previous discussion but as long as we are linking
ICU in, there is no way that any other linker than the C++ compiler
w
William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are 30 unimplmented methods in charset/unicode.h (and a few in
> ascii & binary)
Yeah. Please folks have a look at it. It's not a big deal. To access one
codepoint use ENCODING_GET_CODEPOINT for more in a row use the
String_iter. There should be e
At 09:50 06/04/2005 +, you wrote:
François PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I rename too the new script to mk_inno.pl
Sorry for bothering you again. But with the recent ICU changes,
installing any ICU stuff is obsolete. ICU will be removed from the
source tree soon (when we switch to SVN).
O
On 9 Mar 2005, at 23:34, Millsa Erlas wrote:
Also, what is the status of Ponie and providing complete
interoperability between Perl 5 language and documented XS support and
Parrot and Perl 6? I believe that assuring
For various internal and external reasons work has been pretty much
stalled for
On 6 Apr 2005, at 13:50, Nicholas Clark wrote:
The roadmap starts with an introduction to Ponie, gives instructions
on how to check it out of CVS and build it, and other useful
information, so I'll avoid duplicating its contents here.
Ponie is using released versions of Perl 5.9.x, rather than
Francois PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I rename too the new script to mk_inno.pl
> OK, without handling ICU, the patch is shorter.
Thanks, applied.
leo
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On 9 Mar 2005, at 23:34, Millsa Erlas wrote:
Also, what is the status of Ponie and providing complete
interoperability between Perl 5 language and documented XS support and
Parrot and Perl 6? I believe that assuring
For various internal and external reasons work has been pr
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://opensource.fotango.com/software/ponie/plan
Wow, great detailed plan.
Some remarks:
1) objects seem to be missing
Parrot is much more object oriented then Perl5. The Perl5 "magic" that
depends on custom vtable is basically the task of creating
I've recently had it suggested that Parrot use a regular release
schedule, which tends to maintain momentum and provide many happy
opportunities for spreading propaganda^Wnews of our progress.
So, wearing my Fearless Leader hat, I announce that from now on we'll
be releasing on a regular schedule.
Nick Clark brings to my attention that I'm missing a footnote:
According to Chip Salzenberg:
> * What should the standard be for "good enough" in the build? Quite
> a few tests will be expected to fail on all platforms. We don't
> want a standard that's so rigid it would be at home in
At 06:24 PM 4/6/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
* What platforms are required for release? I'd guess that we'd get
almost of all of our developers (and users, for that matter) with:
darwin
linux-x86-gcc3.*
win32-ms-cl
You should round that out with 64-bit Sparc.
-Melvin
According to MrJoltCola:
> At 06:24 PM 4/6/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > * What platforms are required for release? I'd guess that we'd get
> >almost of all of our developers (and users, for that matter) with:
> >
> > darwin
> > linux-x86-gcc3.*
> > win32-ms-cl
>
> You shou
T least one FC3 x86_64
Jay Scherrer
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 22:28 -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> According to MrJoltCola:
> > At 06:24 PM 4/6/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > > * What platforms are required for release? I'd guess that we'd get
> > >almost of all of our developers (and users, f
At 10:28 PM 4/6/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to MrJoltCola:
> At 06:24 PM 4/6/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > * What platforms are required for release? I'd guess that we'd get
> >almost of all of our developers (and users, for that matter) with:
> >
> > darwin
> > linux-
17 matches
Mail list logo
