theUser BL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I see two problems:
> 1. the license
I can't comment on that, IANAL.
> 2. Parrot is written by Perl-people for Perl
No, definitely not. I'm for example just an occasional Perl user.
> I think it would be better, if there existing a group of 2 Perl pe
[ shoud have gone to the list probaby ]
Original Message
Subject: Re: Another task for the interested - t/pmc/pmc.t
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 07:50:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Steven Schubiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9 Mar, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
The test file t/pmc/pm
Aldo Calpini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > 1) ICU should be optional
> >
> > If configured --without-icu the Makefile shouldn't contain ICU stuff,
> > and function calls to ICU (mainly in string_primitives) should be
> > wrapped inside #if PARROT_HAS_ICU.
> I'm gonna take
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>==30847== Invalid read of size 1
>==30847==at 0x1B904AE0: memcpy (mac_replace_strmem.c:285)
>==30847==by 0x80E36D2: mmd_expand_x (mmd.c:430)
Yeah, that seems to be it. But I've no clue yet, why there's a
difference here with gcc 3.3.3 - I can't se
I have tried gcc 3.2 and gcc 3.4 and these both fail the same tests.
I then tried gcc 2.72 and this also fails make test.
./parrot parrot-config.imc VERSION DEVEL
make: *** [runtime/parrot/include/config.fpmc] Segmentation fault
(core dumped)
make: *** Deleting file `runtime/parrot/include/config
