Re: unused & unimplemented opcodes

2006-03-13 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Leopold Toetsch wrote: There are some opcodes in core.ops which don't do anything: I'd do: setline ... delete, doesn't make sense getline ... move to debug.ops, implement it setfile ... delete getfile ... mpve to debug.ops, implement it setpackagedelete getpackagedel

Re: unused & unimplemented opcodes

2006-03-08 Thread Jonathan Worthington
"Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There are some opcodes in core.ops which don't do anything: I'd do: setline ... delete, doesn't make sense getline ... move to debug.ops, implement it setfile ... delete getfile ... mpve to debug.ops, implement it Where getline and ge

Re: unused & unimplemented opcodes

2006-03-08 Thread Steve Peters
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:16:37PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > There are some opcodes in core.ops which don't do anything: > > I'd do: > > setline ... delete, doesn't make sense > getline ... move to debug.ops, implement it > setfile ... delete > getfile ... mpve to debug.ops,

unused & unimplemented opcodes

2006-03-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
There are some opcodes in core.ops which don't do anything: I'd do: setline ... delete, doesn't make sense getline ... move to debug.ops, implement it setfile ... delete getfile ... mpve to debug.ops, implement it setpackagedelete getpackagedelete - use get_namespace