Re: svn performance

2006-03-22 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2006, at 19:27, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > > > Executive summary -- svn co on Solaris 8 is still *slow*! I"ll stick > > to fetching snapshots with wget. > > Dumb question? Why 'svn co' instead of incrementally updating with 'svn up'?

Re: svn performance

2006-03-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Feb 28, 2006, at 19:27, Andy Dougherty wrote: Executive summary -- svn co on Solaris 8 is still *slow*! I"ll stick to fetching snapshots with wget. Dumb question? Why 'svn co' instead of incrementally updating with 'svn up'? leo

Re: svn performance

2006-02-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 Andy Dougherty wrote: [svn co on Solaris 8 is painfully *slow*] > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz > > real0m16.84s > user0m0.09s > sys 0m0.20s > > $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk > > real 2:0

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 05:23:55PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, jesse wrote: > > Do you, perchance, sit behind an http proxy server? > > Not that I know of (though I'm not sure how I'd know), and no other mode > of communication is similarly affected (i.e. cvs, rsync, etc.,

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:23:55 -0500 (EST) On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, jesse wrote: > Try: > time svn co https://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk svn: Unrecognized URL scheme 'https://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk' I don't know why. I

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, jesse wrote: > > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz > > > > real0m16.84s > > > > $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread jerry gay
On 2/17/06, Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > $ svn --version > svn, version 1.1.4 (r13838) >compiled May 13 2005, 06:29:47 > > How bout you? > can't hurt to upgrade... >svn --version svn, version 1.3.0 (r17949) compiled Jan 15 2006, 23:18:48 ~jerry

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread jesse
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote: > > > > > On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz > > > real0m16.84s > > > $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk > > > real 2:01:50.3 > >

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote: > > On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sigh. I wish it were that simple, or that funny. > > > > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz > > > > real0m16.84s > > user0m0.09s > > sys 0m0.20s >

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Matt Fowles
Andy~ On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote: > > > All~ > > > > On 2/17/06, jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:26AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote: > > > > > snapshots or releases. And, since a

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Robert Spier
> Sigh. I wish it were that simple, or that funny. > > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz > > real0m16.84s > user0m0.09s > sys 0m0.20s > > $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk > > real 2:01:50.3 > user 1:02.0 > sys

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote: > All~ > > On 2/17/06, jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:26AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote: > > > > snapshots or releases. And, since a checkout takes about an hour (last > > > > time I checked) I tend to be too la

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Matt Fowles
All~ On 2/17/06, jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:26AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote: > > > snapshots or releases. And, since a checkout takes about an hour (last > > > time I checked) I tend to be too lazy to fetch one just to make a patch. > > > > Only if you'r

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread jesse
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:26AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote: > > snapshots or releases. And, since a checkout takes about an hour (last > > time I checked) I tend to be too lazy to fetch one just to make a patch. > > Only if you're checking out to a Commodore 64. Or possibly hand-transcri

svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Robert Spier
> snapshots or releases. And, since a checkout takes about an hour (last > time I checked) I tend to be too lazy to fetch one just to make a patch. Only if you're checking out to a Commodore 64. [EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp$ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk > /dev/null re