On Mar 23, 2007, at 7:51 AM, Mike Mattie wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:39:51 -0700
Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
chromatic wrote:
Agreed. And we don't work from the installation paths because the
installation paths are broken. Can we break out of this cycle with
some automated tes
On Friday 23 March 2007 05:51, Mike Mattie wrote:
> This hack is built-in for the runtime core. What is really missing is a
> comprehensive design that de-couples policy (where things go) from
> hand-editing source files.
Last October or November, I posted a PIR snippet that demonstrated how to
Mike,
If someone could point me at a suitable related wiki, or other hosting location
where I could
upload a .png diagram, and some text describing the design I have developed I
should be able
to assemble this sometime within the next week or two.
The Parrot wiki is probably the place to put
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:39:51 -0700
Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> chromatic wrote:
> >
> > My theory: the "all Parrot developers work from within the tree, so
> > installation paths are either not present or wrong" problem is a
> > big problem.
>
> Agreed. And we don't work from th
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:13:55PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> Steven Pritchard wrote:
> >I spent some more time getting a package built for Fedora. It
> >probably goes without saying, but this is still a bit difficult. If
> >anyone is interested, here's my current package:
>
> Thanks, Steve.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:39:51PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> Agreed. And we don't work from the installation paths because the
> installation paths are broken. Can we break out of this cycle with some
> automated tests for the installed Parrot?
That would be pretty slick. :-)
Steve
--
St
chromatic wrote:
My theory: the "all Parrot developers work from within the tree, so
installation paths are either not present or wrong" problem is a big problem.
Agreed. And we don't work from the installation paths because the
installation paths are broken. Can we break out of this cycle w
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 15:13, Allison Randal wrote:
> Steven Pritchard wrote:
> > I spent some more time getting a package built for Fedora. It
> > probably goes without saying, but this is still a bit difficult. If
> > anyone is interested, here's my current package:
> Thanks, Steve. Have
Steven Pritchard wrote:
I spent some more time getting a package built for Fedora. It
probably goes without saying, but this is still a bit difficult. If
anyone is interested, here's my current package:
Thanks, Steve. Have you kept a list of the things that are difficult
about the process? M
I spent some more time getting a package built for Fedora. It
probably goes without saying, but this is still a bit difficult. If
anyone is interested, here's my current package:
http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot/parrot.spec
http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot-0.4.9-1.src.rpm
10 matches
Mail list logo
