Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> t/library/dumper.t5 1280135 38.46% 1-2 5 8 13
> I didn't look too close, but it's probably only the entry points:
> .sub _dumper
> _global_dumper()
Fixed.
leo
Bill Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, here's how the register allocator is doing.
> Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> ---
> t/library/dumper.t5 1280135 38.46%
Thanks Matt,
I hope I can help out. The patch I am submitting actually does
simplify register coloring a bit. I've been waiting for perl6 with so
much anticipation, I just couldn't stand it any more, and I had to
participate.
-Bill
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:17:57 -0400, Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTE
At 3:08 PM -0700 10/28/04, Bill Coffman wrote:
It passes the other tests, plus the
randomized tests that I created, up to 150 symbols. At that range, it
still takes about 20x longer than g++ -O2, for equivalent programs to
compile (see gen4.pl).
Still, that's not bad.
Also, it is currently runnin
Bill~
I have to say that I am really impressed by all of the work that you
are doing, and if you can make the internals of imcc a little more
approachable, you would be doing a great service.
Thanks,
Matt
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:08:23 -0700, Bill Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
Hi all,
Thanks for your continued comments. Btw, I usually read all the
parrot list, so don't think I'm not paying attention.
Currently, here's how the register allocator is doing.
Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-
At 9:36 PM +0200 10/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:09 AM +0200 10/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
So, if you want that really super efficient, you would allocate
registers around function calls directly to that wanted register number,
which should be in the SymReg's want_reg
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:09 AM +0200 10/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
So, if you want that really super efficient, you would allocate
registers around function calls directly to that wanted register number,
which should be in the SymReg's want_regno.
While true, in the general case leaving 0-15 a
At 11:09 AM +0200 10/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Bill Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) In the existing parrot code, when a register is assigned, it uses
the following code:
int c = (color + MAX_COLOR/2) % MAX_COLOR;
Thus, it seems to prefer to use register #1
Bill Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
> I have been hard at work, trying to grok the reg_alloc.c code, and
> with some success. My code is assigning registers, so that none are
> conflicting (which I double-verify), and I'm getting to the end of
> "make".
Wow.
> 1) In the exist
At 6:18 PM -0700 10/25/04, Bill Coffman wrote:
Hello All,
I have been hard at work, trying to grok the reg_alloc.c code, and
with some success. My code is assigning registers, so that none are
conflicting (which I double-verify), and I'm getting to the end of
"make".
Woohoo! A non-trivial thing. :
Hello All,
I have been hard at work, trying to grok the reg_alloc.c code, and
with some success. My code is assigning registers, so that none are
conflicting (which I double-verify), and I'm getting to the end of
"make". Nonetheless, I don't get too far into "make test", and I'm
not quite sure w
12 matches
Mail list logo
