On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:57:26AM -0800, Jonathan Sillito wrote:
> What is the status of the todo's mentioned in the BUGS section, who
> is working on these -- I am looking for a place to jump in. Also
> what is the status of the exception subsystem you mentioned?
All those TODOs are for design,
On 11/29/05, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've reviewed pdd03 and brought it back from pdds/clip.
Thanks for reviving this document Chip. Way back when I implemented
some of the original lexical and calling code (like the scratchpad --
may it rest in peace). What is the status of t
Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Most importantly, I've proposed (but not mandated) a get_params flag
> called "READONLY", which automatically creates a read-only wrapper
> around a PMC parameter.
I'd use READONLY if it existed, though I can get by without it.
Regards,
Roger Browne
I've reviewed pdd03 and brought it back from pdds/clip. Mostly it's
the same as before, albeit with clarifications and a few flag bits
renamed to match PIR. I have made a couple actual changes, though.
On the small side, there's a barest hint of named parameters.
Most importantly, I've proposed
