> Is it as simple as checking whether the OS is Windows, and setting
%options
> to contain appropriate paths, e.g.
It's no use while checking if the OS is Windows, 'cause the distribution is
intended
for only Win 32 users. So you should predefine the hash below.
> %options = ( buildprefix => '',
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 8:48 PM +0200 8/4/03, Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
>>Hi All,
>>
>> are there any info on getting ready-to-try
>> Parrot for win32 as stand-alone distribution?
>
> Not that I know of. If someone's got a working build and can put
> together a tarball or
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What needs to go into the ZIP? My guesses are:-
> - parrot executable
> - imcc executable
These 2 executables are the same.
> - The docs directory
> - The examples directory
> - The languages directory
And Tests.
Anyway, MANI
>Executable distro, I plan that you will just unzip it
> where you want it.
Shucks, my bad (~: For a moment, I was totally convinced
that we did need to make install the distro (~: Sorry.
>Sorry, looks like I've caused confusion. That bit of my email was about
>getting "make install" to work wh
> At 8:48 PM +0200 8/4/03, Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> > are there any info on getting ready-to-try
> > Parrot for win32 as stand-alone distribution?
>
> Not that I know of. If someone's got a working build and can put
> together a tarball or zip file, we can get it up for downloa
- Original Message -
From: "Vladimir Lipskiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "perl6-internals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jonathan Worthington"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone d
On Tuesday, August 05 at 2003 2:40 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 12:12 AM -0400 8/5/03, Melvin Smith wrote:
> >At 11:37 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Brent Dax wrote:
> >>Jonathan Worthington:
> >>> work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean
precompiled
> >>> binaries, not yet. Parrot is sti
At 12:12 AM -0400 8/5/03, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 11:37 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Brent Dax wrote:
Jonathan Worthington:
work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean precompiled
binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under development, so we aren't
shipping
binaries.", so I'm guessing maybe I
Jonathan Worthington:
> work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean precompiled
> binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under development, so we aren't
shipping
> binaries.", so I'm guessing maybe I shouldn't do a ZIP with the
executables
> in? But in that case I guess there's no poin
At 11:37 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Brent Dax wrote:
Jonathan Worthington:
> work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean precompiled
> binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under development, so we aren't
shipping
> binaries.", so I'm guessing maybe I shouldn't do a ZIP with the
executables
>
"Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean
> precompiled binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under development,
> so we aren't shipping binaries.",
This doesn't make sense to me. People who don't like hacking C can
still use a pr
Hi,
> Tuesday, August 5, 2003, 12:28:16 AM, you wrote:
>
> JW> What needs to go into the ZIP? My guesses are:-
> JW> - parrot executable
> JW> - imcc executable
> JW> - The docs directory
> JW> - The examples directory
> JW> - The languages directory
> JW> If you want regular
Hello Jonathan,
Tuesday, August 5, 2003, 12:28:16 AM, you wrote:
JW> I can most probably do this; I've got the latest CVS checkout compiled here.
JW> What needs to go into the ZIP? My guesses are:-
JW> - parrot executable
JW> - imcc executable
JW> - The docs directory
JW> - The e
Hello Brent and others,
BD> If you mean precompiled binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under
BD> development, so we aren't shipping binaries.
OK, clear.
well, what about win32 milestones?
BD> The list is named "perl6-internals" mostly for historical reasons--the
BD> discussion on it is almost e
Hello Dan and ALL,
Monday, August 4, 2003, 11:44:11 PM, you wrote:
DS> Not that I know of. If someone's got a working build and can put
DS> together a tarball or zip file, we can get it up for download.
nice. ... but sounds, strange for me as for newbie :-)
win32 is a platform and there should b
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Valery A.Khamenya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot
mailli
Valery A.Khamenya:
> are there any info on getting ready-to-try
> Parrot for win32 as stand-alone distribution?
If you mean precompiled binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under
development, so we aren't shipping binaries.
> What about separate Parrot maillist?
> (I am really sorry, I am
At 8:48 PM +0200 8/4/03, Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
Hi All,
are there any info on getting ready-to-try
Parrot for win32 as stand-alone distribution?
Not that I know of. If someone's got a working build and can put
together a tarball or zip file, we can get it up for download.
What about sepa
Hi All,
are there any info on getting ready-to-try
Parrot for win32 as stand-alone distribution?
If win32 is not met yet, what are the milestones then?
What about separate Parrot maillist?
(I am really sorry, I am not interested in Perl,
but in Parrot)
thanks a lot.
--
Valery
19 matches
Mail list logo
