Re: one question about vtbls

2000-09-11 Thread Nick Ing-Simmons
Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I have one question about vtbls that I have not been able >to figure out an answer to: > > How does using a vtbl get rid of the switch(sv->sv_flags) >with multi-valued scalars running around? That is, how does >one write a

Re: one question about vtbls

2000-09-10 Thread Chaim Frenkel
>>>>> "BS" == Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BS> I have one question about vtbls that I have not been able BS> to figure out an answer to: BS> How does using a vtbl get rid of the switch(sv->sv_flags) BS> with multi-valued scalars run

one question about vtbls

2000-09-10 Thread Benjamin Stuhl
I have one question about vtbls that I have not been able to figure out an answer to: How does using a vtbl get rid of the switch(sv->sv_flags) with multi-valued scalars running around? That is, how does one write a vtbl function that can cope with the perl6 equivalent of perl5's