> "SC" == Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SC> On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:12:45PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
>> And while were here, does anyone understand kpathsea?
SC> Yes.
>> Would it be a win. I think it would.
SC> There's been some amount of talk on one of the sekrit cabal Te
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:12:45PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> And while were here, does anyone understand kpathsea?
Yes.
> Would it be a win. I think it would.
There's been some amount of talk on one of the sekrit cabal TeX mailing lists
about getting rid of it. I can't see where you'd want
Versions, dear boy. Versions. Don't forget versions.
We will need them.
(This really belongs on -internals. Reply-to: adjusted)
And while were here, does anyone understand kpathsea? Would it be a
win. I think it would.
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> lexer saw a n
