Marcus Thiesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 29 April 2004 19:26, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> It's distinctly possible we'll find compilers that flat-out
>> won't allow us to do this, in which case we'll need a Plan B as
>> fallback.
> Found one :-)
No ;)
2.95.x does align functions and do
On Thursday 29 April 2004 19:26, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> It's distinctly possible we'll find compilers that flat-out
> won't allow us to do this, in which case we'll need a Plan B as
> fallback.
Found one :-)
gcc 2.95.4 dies during perl Configure.pl with the nice message:
cc1: Invalid option `-falig
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not guaranteed anywhere, so having a fallback is definitely in
> order. It's distinctly possible we'll find compilers that flat-out
> won't allow us to do this, in which case we'll need a Plan B as
> fallback.
Plan B is a bit more expensiv but of cou
At 1:15 PM -0400 4/29/04, Simon Glover wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:07 PM +0200 4/29/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At 6:43 PM +0200 4/29/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>>
>>>I can't see, why this patch should break t/pmc/float.t a
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 7:07 PM +0200 4/29/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> At 6:43 PM +0200 4/29/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I can't see, why this patch should break t/pmc/float.t and:
> >
> >> Because GCC doesn't align
At 7:07 PM +0200 4/29/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 6:43 PM +0200 4/29/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I can't see, why this patch should break t/pmc/float.t and:
Because GCC doesn't align function pointers unless you ask it to,
Argh. System depend weird stuff.
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 6:43 PM +0200 4/29/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>
>>I can't see, why this patch should break t/pmc/float.t and:
> Because GCC doesn't align function pointers unless you ask it to,
Argh. System depend weird stuff. gcc does function aligning on x86
though
At 6:43 PM +0200 4/29/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cvsuser 04/04/29 08:56:04
Add in Leo's proof-of-concept single table MMD patch, though it does
kill the float tests right now
I can't see, why this patch should break t/pmc/float.t and:
Because GCC
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cvsuser 04/04/29 08:56:04
> Add in Leo's proof-of-concept single table MMD patch, though it does
> kill the float tests right now
I can't see, why this patch should break t/pmc/float.t and:
$ perl -Ilib t/pmc/float.t
1..9
ok 1 - basic assignment
