Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>DS> I was actually thinking that @b * @c would boil down to a single vtable
>DS> call--we'd just hit the multiply function for variable @b, and pass it a
>DS> pointer to @c, and let it Do The Rig
> "RLS" == Randal L Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Chaim" == Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chaim> Given N different fundemental types, we end up with NxN vtbl entries.
Chaim> A long time ago I looked at some smalltalk code that did
Chaim> foo add: bar
Chaim> It mus
> "Randal" == Randal L Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Randal> Yes, double dispatch. Addressed by "the Damian" in Object Oriented Perl
Randal> (the Book, and the forthcoming Musical) as it applies to perl at a Perl
Randal> level.
Duh - 30 seconds with google found a nice reference on i
> "Chaim" == Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chaim> Given N different fundemental types, we end up with NxN vtbl entries.
Chaim> A long time ago I looked at some smalltalk code that did
Chaim> foo add: bar
Chaim> It must have been pretty bad, because I can't remember how they di
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> I was actually thinking that @b * @c would boil down to a single vtable
DS> call--we'd just hit the multiply function for variable @b, and pass it a
DS> pointer to @c, and let it Do The Right Thing.
But that was my question in the _oth
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 11:17:17AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 11:23 AM 8/15/00 +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 02:03:12PM +1000, Jeremy Howard wrote:
> > > The PDL team are now examining how to incorporate these kinds of features
> > > into perl 6. I'm also interested in
David L . Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Just in case I'm not the only one here who doesn't know what TIL means:
>
>http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/jgm/tilt.html
Well I have been using 'TIL' to mean "Threaded Interpretive Language"
There is a Z80 FORTH clone defined in :
"Threaded Interpret
At 11:23 AM 8/15/00 +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 02:03:12PM +1000, Jeremy Howard wrote:
> > The PDL team are now examining how to incorporate these kinds of features
> > into perl 6. I'm also interested in seeing how to implement things like
> > (from RFC 82)
> >
> >
> > @
Graham Barr wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 02:03:12PM +1000, Jeremy Howard wrote:
> > The PDL team are now examining how to incorporate these kinds of
features
> > into perl 6. I'm also interested in seeing how to implement things like
> > (from RFC 82)
> >
> >
> > @b = (1,2,3);
> > @c = (2
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 02:03:12PM +1000, Jeremy Howard wrote:
> The PDL team are now examining how to incorporate these kinds of features
> into perl 6. I'm also interested in seeing how to implement things like
> (from RFC 82)
>
>
> @b = (1,2,3);
> @c = (2,4,6);
> @d = (-2,-4,-6);
> $s
> i think you are mistaken. TIL means to me Threaded In Line code. the
> term threaded code had a meaning way before execution threads. it is a
> very simple way to generate executable machine code and some compilers
> used it. all the work was done in subroutines (as in perl) but the
> generated
> "DLN" == David L Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DLN> Just in case I'm not the only one here who doesn't know what TIL
DLN> means:
DLN> http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/jgm/tilt.html
i think you are mistaken. TIL means to me Threaded In Line code. the
term threaded code had a meanin
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, David L. Nicol wrote:
>
> Just in case I'm not the only one here who doesn't know what TIL means:
Ummm, no. Threaded Interpreted Language. Different TLA. :)
Dan
Just in case I'm not the only one here who doesn't know what TIL means:
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/jgm/tilt.html
14 matches
Mail list logo
