At 12:36 AM 9/25/2001 +1000, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
>G'day all.
>
>On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 10:27:24AM -0400, Michael Maraist wrote:
>
> > Does it have to be in the instruction stream to be useful?
>
>No, of course not. I said "instruction" because that's how I saw it
>implemented last, but that
G'day all.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 10:27:24AM -0400, Michael Maraist wrote:
> Does it have to be in the instruction stream to be useful?
No, of course not. I said "instruction" because that's how I saw it
implemented last, but that was in a compiler backend, not in a virtual
machine specificat
> I have a suggestion for allowing parrot implementations to execute
> code more efficiently. Add an "instruction" or other annotation which
> denotes what registers are "live" at some point in the code. The
Does it have to be in the instruction stream to be useful? Why not just
be part of the
Andrew J Bromage sent the following bits through the ether:
> What do you all think? Leon mentioned control flow graphs a few days
> ago, but I think that live value information is more generally useful
> to optimising interpreters and JIT compilers.
I guess it depends what level you want to b
G'day all.
I have a suggestion for allowing parrot implementations to execute
code more efficiently. Add an "instruction" or other annotation which
denotes what registers are "live" at some point in the code. The
intended usage is that compilers which wish to generate this
information generate
