Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish!

2004-10-15 Thread Austin Hastings
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote: I tried, I really did, but I'm afraid that I must raise the white flag to my teacher training for the next while and give up writing the Perl 6 Summary until at least after Christmas. Bad food, lousy dental care, and now the childrens' education is entrusted to a ch

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish!

2004-10-15 Thread grassie
Piers, Thanks for all the work you've done in keeping us up-to-date with Perl 6 developments. Your summaries have been crucial in convincing folks out there that much progress is being made, and that Perl 6 will be a language worth the wait. Kind regards, Paul Grassie [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish!

2004-10-15 Thread Matt Fowles
All~ I am willing to try and take on this responsibility. I have been reading p6i for several years now and always appreciated the summary, so what better way to give back. Any advice/scripts that Piers (or anyone else) can provide me would be appreciated. Matt -- "Computer Science is merely t

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish!

2004-10-15 Thread Leopold Toetsch
The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried, I really did, but I'm afraid that I must raise the white flag > ..- Dan, Leo and the > rest of the p6i team have done fantastic work Thanks for the flowers and of course for all your precise summaries. > ... But if any of you are thinki

So long, and thanks for all the fish!

2004-10-14 Thread The Perl 6 Summarizer
I tried, I really did, but I'm afraid that I must raise the white flag to my teacher training for the next while and give up writing the Perl 6 Summary until at least after Christmas. I've had a great time doing this for the last two and a half years, I hope you've all enjoyed it too. It's been a

Re: So long

2002-09-12 Thread Peter Sergeant
John Porter wrote: > Immediately whereupon he took advantage of the > highest-visibility vehicle available to him, the p6i summary, to > pillory me. > Now, I tend to think that that was an abuse of power, considering > he is completely unaccountable to anyone for what he writes there. This seem

Re: So long

2002-09-12 Thread Piers Cawley
John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've decided it's time for me to take another break from this list. > Not that any of you care, but I think the reason is important. > > Due to a silly misunderstanding -- one which could have been easily > avoided by a simple request for clarification --

So long

2002-09-12 Thread John Porter
I've decided it's time for me to take another break from this list. Not that any of you care, but I think the reason is important. Due to a silly misunderstanding -- one which could have been easily avoided by a simple request for clarification -- our Illustrious Summarizer decided to be grievous