Re: Segfault warning boxes on Win32

2003-11-26 Thread Robert Spier
> > More important -- is the Segfault reported in any other manner. If > > not, thats bad. > > It's not, I'm afraid Then this shouldn't be off by default. Turn it off for automated testing. But in general use, I think you want this on. "Oh look. My program just went away. I wonder why?" -R

Re: Segfault warning boxes on Win32

2003-11-26 Thread Vladimir Lipsky
> At Wed, 26 Nov 2003 05:20:50 +0300, > Vladimir Lipsky wrote: > > > > If it blocks the automated test builds, then just turning the box off is > > okay. It must be admitted that, the truth is that I don't know anybody > > who does send those reports > > More important -- is the Segfault reported i

Re: Segfault warning boxes on Win32

2003-11-26 Thread Jonathan Worthington
- Original Message - From: "Robert Spier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "perl6-internals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:51 AM Subject: Re: Segfault warning boxes on Win32 > At Wed, 26 Nov 2003 05:20:50 +0300, > Vladimir

Re: Segfault warning boxes on Win32

2003-11-25 Thread Robert Spier
At Wed, 26 Nov 2003 05:20:50 +0300, Vladimir Lipsky wrote: > > If it blocks the automated test builds, then just turning the box off is > okay. It must be admitted that, the truth is that I don't know anybody > who does send those reports More important -- is the Segfault reported in any other ma

Re: Segfault warning boxes on Win32

2003-11-25 Thread Vladimir Lipsky
gt; Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 7:58 PM Subject: Segfault warning boxes on Win32 > Folks, > > I just committed a patch to disable the "Your program has crashed, want to > send a report to Microsoft" box that pops up on Win32 when Parrot > segfaults -- it blocks

Segfault warning boxes on Win32

2003-11-25 Thread Dan Sugalski
Folks, I just committed a patch to disable the "Your program has crashed, want to send a report to Microsoft" box that pops up on Win32 when Parrot segfaults -- it blocks the automated test builds which as you might expect happens with some regularity. :) However I'm not sure if this ought be the