On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:42:51PM +0300, luben karavelov wrote:
> I can run the NQP generated PIR after addition of:
>
> load_bytecode 'compilers/nqp/nqp.pbc'
>
> in the first sub. But I can not find how to run rakudo generated PIR
> code. The "load_bytecode" seems no be not enought (some months
Jeff Horwitz wrote:
the implicit return is by definition always at the end of a sub and
therefore emits a PIR .return(). it's fast and easy.
the explicit return, in contrast, could be anywhere in a subroutine,
including loops, closures, etc. these constructs are also implemented
using parro
Will Coleda wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:53 AM, luben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this on purpose? The implicit return is 4-5 times faster than explicit
return.
Best regards
luben
CC'ing perl6-compiler (where rakudo-particular items should go), and
wondering if you can attach the gene
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, luben wrote:
I have noticed that Rakudo (and NQP) generates different PIR code for
implicit and explicit returns.
Example for implicit return:
sub foo($n){
$n;
}
And example for explicit return:
sub foo($n){
return $n;
}
Is this on purpose? The implicit return is
Will Coleda wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:53 AM, luben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have noticed that Rakudo (and NQP) generates different PIR code for
implicit and explicit returns.
Example for implicit return:
sub foo($n){
$n;
}
And example for explicit return:
sub foo($n){
return
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:53 AM, luben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have noticed that Rakudo (and NQP) generates different PIR code for
> implicit and explicit returns.
>
> Example for implicit return:
>
> sub foo($n){
> $n;
> }
>
> And example for explicit return:
>
> sub foo($n){
> return
