Dan Sugalski wrote:
For plain PerlHash PMCs, yes, they should be PMCs only. The union went
into them in a fit of enthusiasm and generality. :) More specialized
aggregates can hold more specialized things, but I'm not sure we're
going to have a need for something that really efficiently holds
At 9:30 AM +0200 10/21/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jason Gloudon wrote:
The vtable PDD refers to type_keyed returning the type of the *PMC*. This
isn't accurate given the question. Should we change the PDD ?
As we are now (almost) able to generate packed arrays of chars,
shorts , we shou
Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
While working on ...something... I found the need to be able to tell if
a key exists in a PerlHash. Here's the kicker, I don't know what kind
of data's gonna be there: int, float, PMC, or string.
[ snipp ]
exists Px[key], branch
PDD02 specifies the needed m
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 12:32:24PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> PDD02 specifies the needed methods
>
> exists_keyed
> type_keyed
The vtable PDD refers to type_keyed returning the type of the *PMC*. This
isn't accurate given the question. Should we change the PDD ?
> perlhash/arr