On 15/09/2007, Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious about the test coverage some of the listings. There's 100%
> coverage of src/pmc/compiler.pmc but 12.5% coverage of
> src/pmc/compiler.c which is created from compiler.pmc. With the
> inheritence of pmc's, won't that screw with t
Bob Rogers wrote on Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 04:28:03PM PDT:
> I suspect Gmail because you and Paul are the only ones affected, and you
> both have Gmail addresses However, I have no explanation why
> Klaas-Jan and Jerry (the other two Gmail users to post in the last
> three days) seem to be unaffe
From: Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:09:31 -0500
I did get a delay email from gmail. So either gmail's servers are
screwed up and accidently resending the same email repeatedly and not
knowing it succeeded or perl.org's mail servers are screwed up and
I did get a delay email from gmail. So either gmail's servers are
screwed up and accidently resending the same email repeatedly and not
knowing it succeeded or perl.org's mail servers are screwed up and
making gmail think it needs to be delayed when it's actually sent. But
it's my first time
Bob Rogers wrote:
one could argue it's perl.org's fault for not discarding
duplicates.
-- Bob Rogers
I corresponded with ask earlier today and, as usual, he is on the case.
From: Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:32:28 -0400
Is anyone else seeing a large # of copies of ptc's messages to p2
lately?
Yes. I also have 18 copies of Joshua Isom's message that starts "It's
the little magic ...". Both Joshua and Paul have gmail.com ad
Is anyone else seeing a large # of copies of ptc's messages to p2
lately?
On Sep 15, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
Hi everyone,
I finally managed to get the 'make cover' target working so that we
can now see the test coverage of the C-language parts of Parrot.
kid51++ (Jim Keenan)
I'm curious about the test coverage some of the listings. There's 100%
coverage of src/pmc/compiler.pmc but 12.5% coverage of
src/pmc/compiler.c which is created from compiler.pmc. With the
inheritence of pmc's, won't that screw with the coverage reports as
well?
But, as a side note, when I
