Re: Test::Builder change BAILOUT -> BAIL_OUT

2005-05-05 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 12:24:34PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote: > >Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.61 will introduce a change to Test::Builder > >whereby the BAILOUT() method becomes BAIL_OUT(). Additionally > >Test::More > >finally features a BAIL_OUT() function. > [snip] > > Just out of curiosity -

Re: Test::Builder change BAILOUT -> BAIL_OUT

2005-05-05 Thread Adrian Howard
On 3 May 2005, at 23:36, Michael G Schwern wrote: Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.61 will introduce a change to Test::Builder whereby the BAILOUT() method becomes BAIL_OUT(). Additionally Test::More finally features a BAIL_OUT() function. [snip] Just out of curiosity - any particular reason for the c

Re: Test::Builder change BAILOUT -> BAIL_OUT

2005-05-03 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:23:01PM -0700, chromatic wrote: > Parrot bundles Test::Builder 0.11 (from Test-Simple 0.41). Is it worth > upgrading? Couldn't hurt. A whole mess of is_deeply() bugs have been fixed since 0.41. -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~sch

Re: Test::Builder change BAILOUT -> BAIL_OUT

2005-05-03 Thread chromatic
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 15:36 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.61 will introduce a change to Test::Builder > whereby the BAILOUT() method becomes BAIL_OUT(). Additionally Test::More > finally features a BAIL_OUT() function. > > Using cpansearch [1] I've determined that