Re: Shared library question

2004-11-05 Thread Sam Ruby
Sam Ruby wrote: I have a simple unit test[1], one that was not intended to be a benchmark. I probably should have included the following in my email *blush*: [1] http://intertwingly.net/stories/2004/11/05/parrot/t/dynclass/pyint.t - Sam Ruby

Re: Shared library question

2004-11-05 Thread Sam Ruby
Dan Sugalski wrote: At 3:49 PM -0500 11/4/04, Sam Ruby wrote: Background: Pmc2c.pm emits code which references Parrot_PMC_typenum. This code is present in libparrot.so, which currently is not referenced as a library by the link step for dynclasses. Options include: 1) eliminating this dependen

Re: Shared library question

2004-11-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 3:49 PM -0500 11/4/04, Sam Ruby wrote: Background: Pmc2c.pm emits code which references Parrot_PMC_typenum. This code is present in libparrot.so, which currently is not referenced as a library by the link step for dynclasses. Options include: 1) eliminating this dependency, as it is the onl