Simon Wistow said:
> Might it be worth using something like
>
> http://usefulinc.com/chump/
>
> (as seen in use at http://pants.heddley.com/index.html)
> ?
>
> It's written in Python but there's a Perl replacement (to stem the PR
> nightmare), which is 99% complete, lurking around which
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 08:54:30PM +0300, Iacob Alin said:
> The guys from London.pm wrote Scribot (http://www.scribot.com/) wich could
> be more useful...
Yeah I know - Leon wrote the original and then I patched it :)
http://thegestalt.org/simon/perl/scribot2.html
Leon's done another revision
Simon Wistow said:
> Might it be worth using something like
>
> http://usefulinc.com/chump/
>
> (as seen in use at http://pants.heddley.com/index.html)
> ?
>
> It's written in Python but there's a Perl replacement (to stem the PR
> nightmare), which is 99% complete, lurking around which was writte
At 10:09 AM +0100 7/14/02, Simon Wistow wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 05:00:42PM -0400, Jim Cromie said:
>> can we could invent a super-lightweight markup language
>> that #parrot-eers would type into the stream to put meta-info into it ?
>
>Might it be worth using something like
>
>http://use
At 8:06 AM +0100 7/14/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
>Jim Cromie sent the following bits through the ether:
>
>> can we could invent a super-lightweight markup language
>> that #parrot-eers would type into the stream to put meta-info into it ?
>
>OK, I'll finally join this discussion. Yes, IRC is handy
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 05:00:42PM -0400, Jim Cromie said:
> can we could invent a super-lightweight markup language
> that #parrot-eers would type into the stream to put meta-info into it ?
Might it be worth using something like
http://usefulinc.com/chump/
(as seen in use at http://pants.hedd
Jim Cromie sent the following bits through the ether:
> can we could invent a super-lightweight markup language
> that #parrot-eers would type into the stream to put meta-info into it ?
OK, I'll finally join this discussion. Yes, IRC is handy for realtime
questions like (just an example as it ha
Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
>An IRC channel is good for discussions. But it doesn't archive them,
>index them, collate them and provide them as reference for any new
>would be recruits. I'm not saying that anyone has to write the docs, or
>even the skeleton of the docs for their code - everyone and a
