Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Cool. Can we have a URL when it's done? (An english translation'd be
> keen too, but there's always BabelFish to mangle the heck out of it)
Sure. Currently it looks like it'll be published August or September.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
At 11:17 AM +0200 5/24/02, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Hello there!
>
> I'm currently preparing an article on Parrot for a German magazine.
Cool. Can we have a URL when it's done? (An english translation'd be
keen too, but there's always BabelFish to mangle the heck out of it)
> While des
> > > I know the technical reason for a new VM, but this could've been a
new
> > > VM for Perl 6 only. What I'd like to know is the motivation to open
up
> > > the architecture and allow for plugable parser, compilers, bytecode
> > > generators / optimizers, ...
> >
> >
>
> I believe that
I believe that the idea is to make things flexible enough that FURTHER
changes to Perl, beyond Perl 6, will be easier too.
On Sun, 2002-05-26 at 06:10, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sebastian Bergmann) writes:
>
> > Leon Brocard wrote:
> > > Oh, this happens to be a FAQ. The main
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:48:13AM -0400, Melvin Smith wrote:
> I hate debugging stack operations. Its one of the hardest bug's to spot
> in my limited experience. For this reason I'm glad that Parrot allows me
> to think in registers, not stack locations. Given, everything I've said
> relates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sebastian Bergmann) writes:
> Leon Brocard wrote:
> > Oh, this happens to be a FAQ. The main reason is:
> >
> > http://www.parrotcode.org/faq/
>
> I know the technical reason for a new VM, but this could've been a new
> VM for Perl 6 only. What I'd like to know is the moti
Melvin Smith wrote:
> I hope this blabbering helps you with a few ideas.
Thank you for your elaboration, Melvin.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/
At 11:42 AM 5/24/2002 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>Leon Brocard wrote:
> > Oh, this happens to be a FAQ. The main reason is:
> >
> > http://www.parrotcode.org/faq/
>
> I know the technical reason for a new VM, but this could've been a new
> VM for Perl 6 only. What I'd like to know is the
> Leon Brocard wrote:
> > Oh, this happens to be a FAQ. The main reason is:
> >
> > http://www.parrotcode.org/faq/
>
> I know the technical reason for a new VM, but this could've been a new
> VM for Perl 6 only. What I'd like to know is the motivation to open up
> the architecture and allo
Leon Brocard wrote:
> Oh, this happens to be a FAQ. The main reason is:
>
> http://www.parrotcode.org/faq/
I know the technical reason for a new VM, but this could've been a new
VM for Perl 6 only. What I'd like to know is the motivation to open up
the architecture and allow for plugable pa
Sebastian Bergmann sent the following bits through the ether:
> It'd be great if you could comment of different goals, etc. between
> Parrot and the .Net concept.
Oh, this happens to be a FAQ. The main reason is:
http://www.parrotcode.org/faq/
* Why your own virtual machine? Why not compile to
11 matches
Mail list logo
