Re: PASM and PIR: design decisions needed

2007-10-01 Thread Allison Randal
Nuno 'smash' Carvalho wrote: Still working on it. Sorry, but haven't had much free time lately, but i'll try to finish this ASAP. Great. KJS, you might take a pass over it too. You've had a lot of good cleanup suggestions. Allison

Re: PASM and PIR: design decisions needed

2007-10-01 Thread Nuno 'smash' Carvalho
On 10/1/07, Nuno 'smash' Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetins parrot people, > > On 9/28/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Smash and I have been communicating about about the PIR PDD > > (docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod). He has started it, and is continuing to > > refine it

Re: PASM and PIR: design decisions needed

2007-10-01 Thread Nuno 'smash' Carvalho
Greetins parrot people, On 9/28/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Smash and I have been communicating about about the PIR PDD > (docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod). He has started it, and is continuing to > refine it. Anyone is welcome to pitch in on that. He'll let me know when > it's r

Re: PASM and PIR: design decisions needed

2007-09-27 Thread Allison Randal
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: Hi, I've spent some time on refactoring imcc's parser and lexer a bit (only minor) and I guess the time has come for some design decisions, if possible. Currently, IMCC handles both PIR and PASM. smash++ suggested that PDDs should be finished for both PASM and PIR. Once PA