Re: Native support for GNU R

2005-02-10 Thread MrJoltCola
At 01:40 PM 2/9/2005, Aaron Sherman wrote: On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I read that you can provide support (in Perl 6) for most languages that > parsers have been written for. As it appears to me, however, the languages > that you are mainly interested in are substitute

Re: Native support for GNU R

2005-02-09 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I read that you can provide support (in Perl 6) for most languages that > parsers have been written for. As it appears to me, however, the languages > that you are mainly interested in are substitutes (competitors) to Perl. You're mista

Re: Native support for GNU R

2005-02-09 Thread yves
I read that you can provide support (in Perl 6) for most languages that parsers have been written for. As it appears to me, however, the languages that you are mainly interested in are substitutes (competitors) to Perl. Also, you might include languages that are complementary to Perl. I fig