On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 06:04:56PM -0400, Randy W. Sims wrote:
> On 4/6/2004 11:06 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >At 6:12 AM -0400 4/4/04, Randy W. Sims wrote:
> >[Scheme 1: hierarchy munging]
> >
> >[Scheme 2: loadable-library style plugins]
> >
> >>Is there anything in the above that stands out as po
At 6:04 PM -0400 4/6/04, Randy W. Sims wrote:
On 4/6/2004 11:06 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 6:12 AM -0400 4/4/04, Randy W. Sims wrote:
[Scheme 1: hierarchy munging]
[Scheme 2: loadable-library style plugins]
Is there anything in the above that stands out as potentially
being problematic?
Well, t
On 4/6/2004 11:06 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 6:12 AM -0400 4/4/04, Randy W. Sims wrote:
[Scheme 1: hierarchy munging]
[Scheme 2: loadable-library style plugins]
Is there anything in the above that stands out as potentially being
problematic?
Well, there are a lot of languages that really dislik
At 6:12 AM -0400 4/4/04, Randy W. Sims wrote:
[Scheme 1: hierarchy munging]
[Scheme 2: loadable-library style plugins]
Is there anything in the above that stands out as potentially being
problematic?
Well, there are a lot of languages that really dislike having their
inheritance hierarchy change
